[bcab] Re: Samaritans - Earmail access
- From: "George Bell" <george@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <bcab@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 20:58:23 +0100
Let's be a shade more constructive here.
The Samaritans motives are absolutely admirable. But sad
that the DDA has tripped them up.
So how can the accessibility problems be overcome?
George.
________________________________
From: bcab-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:bcab-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Graham Page
Sent: 28 September 2006 20:35
To: bcab@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bcab] Re: Samaritans - Earmail access
could they be prosecuted under the DDA or would that fail
because it is an organisation of volunteers?
while you may not want to fully go down that road if you
could help it, the threat may get them to do something about
it.
cheers
graham
----- Original Message -----
From: Anne Rigby <mailto:anne.rigby@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: bcab@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2006 12:35 PM
Subject: [bcab] Re: Samaritans - Earmail access
Hello, all,
In an attempt to clarify this, I used to be a
Samaritan volunteer.
The e-mail system they use is designed to keep
e-mails annonymous, so that any branch of Samaritans can
collect e-mails and respond to them. It's a system which, I
believe, was designed for them specifically. While I was a
volunteer, I, and other blind volunteers, tried to get them
to make the system screen reader accessible, but without any
success. Unless things have changed recently, you still
can't access the Samaritans' e-mail system with a screen
reader at all.
Hope this helps.
Anne
-----Original Message-----
From: bcab-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:bcab-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Graham Page
Sent: 27 September 2006 23:27
To: bcab@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bcab] Re: Samaritans - Earmail
access
not really no. they are generally
volunteers and though of course some people will be paid
within the organisation, many are volunteers and I believe
this volunteering goes beyond purely those dealing with
calls from the public.
In terms of my own question, however, I did
a search for earmail and came up with the following link
http://www.prweb.com/releases/2006/4/prweb369733.htm
it suggests that earmail is a system where a
user can send and receive mail using a preexisting email
account and a telephone. Unless you have to administer a
server then, accessibility should not be an issue. However,
I would have thought that any reply would be in the form of
an attached voice message. the idea of emailing the
Samaritan with a plea for help and getting back a voice
message when you expect a written reply to this sounds a
bit odd so maybe there is something else called earmail.
Regards
Graham
More likely access by a visually impaired
person or anyone else wasn't even considered.
----- Original Message -----
From: John M Hull
<mailto:j.m.hull@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: bcab@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2006
9:03 PM
Subject: [bcab] Re: Samaritans -
Earmail access
...moreover, one would expect such
an organisation that specialises in councelling people in
crisis would be particularly sensitive to accessibility,
don't you think?
John
-----Original Message-----
From: bcab-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:bcab-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Graham Page
Sent: 27 September 2006 20:36
To: bcab@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bcab] Re: Samaritans -
Earmail access
no, but I am definitely curious.
why would an organisation so short of cash use a specialist
email system that must have cost a load to implement when
they can get perfectly good email clients that would be
secure enough for their needs for free?
just wondering what else it may do
that's so special.
Cheers
Graham
----- Original Message -----
From: Andrew Hodgson
<mailto:andrew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: bcab@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2006
2:21 PM
Subject: [bcab] Samaritans - Earmail
access
Hi,
I am just wondering whether anyone
here has had experience of using the Earmail system found at
the Samaritans? This is some sort of specialist email
system, and a user is having some trouble reading past
messages on the system.
She is using JFW 7.
Any info please let me know.
Thanks.
Andrew.
__________ NOD32 1.1779 (20060927)
Information __________
This message was checked by NOD32
antivirus system.
http://www.eset.com
__________ NOD32 1.1781 (20060928) Information
__________
This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system.
http://www.eset.com
- Follow-Ups:
- [bcab] Re: Samaritans - Earmail access
- From: Graham Page
- References:
- [bcab] Re: Samaritans - Earmail access
- From: Graham Page
Other related posts:
- » [bcab] Samaritans - Earmail access
- » [bcab] Re: Samaritans - Earmail access
- » [bcab] Re: Samaritans - Earmail access
- » [bcab] Re: Samaritans - Earmail access
- » [bcab] Re: Samaritans - Earmail access
- » [bcab] Re: Samaritans - Earmail access
- » [bcab] Re: Samaritans - Earmail access
- » [bcab] Re: Samaritans - Earmail access
- » [bcab] Re: Samaritans - Earmail access
- » [bcab] Re: Samaritans - Earmail access
- » [bcab] Re: Samaritans - Earmail access
- » [bcab] Re: Samaritans - Earmail access
- » [bcab] Re: Samaritans - Earmail access
- » [bcab] Re: Samaritans - Earmail access
- [bcab] Re: Samaritans - Earmail access
- From: Graham Page
- [bcab] Re: Samaritans - Earmail access
- From: Graham Page