[bcab] Re: FineReader OCR
- From: "Tony M Dart" <tony@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <bcab@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 17:16:15 -0000
Hi Vince
Thanks for suggestion - I think it has a document mode which I think is the
same as a monochrome mode. I will have a play with that - if it works as well
then it will make file sizes smaller and work faster. Camera is 8 megapixel so
gives me about 300 dpi on an A4 page which I think is about optimum for OCR.
The aim eventually is to have a set-up that will read anything perfectly
without individual fiddling with the file - although I appreciate this may mean
the software having to try things out and be self-adaptive.
Regards
Tony
----- Original Message -----
From: Vince Thacker
To: bcab@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 3:25 PM
Subject: [bcab] Re: FineReader OCR
Tony, for what it's worth I find it can simplify things to convert scanned
images to grey-scale and then adjust the brightness and shadow settings in a
graphics program so that the text stands out more - and sometimes it makes it
clearer if you make the image negative. Depends so much on all your hardware
and your vision, I suppose.
Someone shoed me the 'document' mode on their digital camera, and I must say
there's a lot of potential there for creating the equivalent of a scanned
image. I think the spec of the camera was about 6 megapixels, which is fairly
standard now.
Vince.
----- Original Message -----
From: Tony M Dart
To: bcab@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 2:31 PM
Subject: [bcab] FineReader OCR
Hi
I have recently been doing some tests with FineReader OCR on difficult to
read material - text over coloured backgrounds and photographs. (Specifically
the backs of paperback books).
I have been using both FineReader 7 and FineReader 8. Oddly enough, 7
performs this much better than 8 - it is faster and far, far more accurate
(often 100%!).
I have also found that successive scans on my cheapo Xerox flatbed scanner
give different errors, so I assume this is down to fluctuations in the
scanner's physical performance. Successive photos with a digital camera do not
give this problem.
I would be deeply interested to hear of anyone elses experiences,
experiments and setups for OCR.
Regards
Tony
I'm protected by SpamBrave
- References:
- [bcab] FW: Scottish public bodies could face legal action for failing disabled people
- From: Derek Naysmith
- [bcab] FineReader OCR
- From: Tony M Dart
- [bcab] Re: FineReader OCR
- From: Vince Thacker
Other related posts:
- » [bcab] FineReader OCR
- » [bcab] Re: FineReader OCR
- » [bcab] Re: FineReader OCR
- » [bcab] Re: FineReader OCR
- » [bcab] Re: FineReader OCR
- » [bcab] Re: FineReader OCR
- » [bcab] Re: FineReader OCR
- » [bcab] Re: FineReader OCR
- » [bcab] Re: FineReader OCR
- » [bcab] Re: FineReader OCR
- » [bcab] Re: FineReader OCR
- » [bcab] Re: FineReader OCR
- » [bcab] Re: FineReader OCR
- » [bcab] Re: FineReader OCR
- » [bcab] Re: FineReader OCR
- » [bcab] Re: FineReader OCR
- » [bcab] Re: FineReader OCR
- » [bcab] Re: FineReader OCR
- » [bcab] Re: FineReader OCR
- » [bcab] Re: FineReader OCR
- » [bcab] Re: FineReader OCR
- » [bcab] Re: FineReader OCR
- » [bcab] Re: FineReader OCR
- » [bcab] Re: FineReader OCR
- [bcab] FW: Scottish public bodies could face legal action for failing disabled people
- From: Derek Naysmith
- [bcab] FineReader OCR
- From: Tony M Dart
- [bcab] Re: FineReader OCR
- From: Vince Thacker