[bcab] FineReader OCR
- From: "Tony M Dart" <tony@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <bcab@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 14:31:09 -0000
Hi
I have recently been doing some tests with FineReader OCR on difficult to read
material - text over coloured backgrounds and photographs. (Specifically the
backs of paperback books).
I have been using both FineReader 7 and FineReader 8. Oddly enough, 7 performs
this much better than 8 - it is faster and far, far more accurate (often 100%!).
I have also found that successive scans on my cheapo Xerox flatbed scanner give
different errors, so I assume this is down to fluctuations in the scanner's
physical performance. Successive photos with a digital camera do not give this
problem.
I would be deeply interested to hear of anyone elses experiences, experiments
and setups for OCR.
Regards
Tony
- Follow-Ups:
- [bcab] Re: FineReader OCR
- From: Dorothy Ingram-Gorban
- [bcab] Re: FineReader OCR
- From: Vince Thacker
- References:
Other related posts:
- » [bcab] FineReader OCR
- » [bcab] Re: FineReader OCR
- » [bcab] Re: FineReader OCR
- » [bcab] Re: FineReader OCR
- » [bcab] Re: FineReader OCR
- » [bcab] Re: FineReader OCR
- » [bcab] Re: FineReader OCR
- » [bcab] Re: FineReader OCR
- » [bcab] Re: FineReader OCR
- » [bcab] Re: FineReader OCR
- » [bcab] Re: FineReader OCR
- » [bcab] Re: FineReader OCR
- » [bcab] Re: FineReader OCR
- » [bcab] Re: FineReader OCR
- » [bcab] Re: FineReader OCR
- » [bcab] Re: FineReader OCR
- » [bcab] Re: FineReader OCR
- » [bcab] Re: FineReader OCR
- » [bcab] Re: FineReader OCR
- » [bcab] Re: FineReader OCR
- » [bcab] Re: FineReader OCR
- » [bcab] Re: FineReader OCR
- » [bcab] Re: FineReader OCR
- » [bcab] Re: FineReader OCR
- [bcab] Re: FineReader OCR
- From: Dorothy Ingram-Gorban
- [bcab] Re: FineReader OCR
- From: Vince Thacker