[bcab] Re: Computer security
- From: "Dj Paddy" <mygroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <bcab@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 22:00:49 +0100
I have heard reports of people experiencing improvements in stability on
their WIFI connections after applying this patch.
Not sure what else it fixes but it makes sense. There's less traffic when
your computer stops broadcasting as well as recieving.
Dj Paddy
Ôà
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tristram Llewellyn" <tris-l@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <bcab@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 9:47 AM
Subject: [bcab] Re: Computer security
Wireless is a classic example of user convenience verses security. It is
convenient and all we like it, we can go round the house without it etc. but
it is not as secure as copper wire. Wireless if anything is less secure
because it would be possible to get access to the traffic (between you and a
wireless router) if you happen to be sitting within range, and had time to
pursue a brute force attack on the data to break the encryption. This has
certainly happened with WEP and may possibly happen with WPA at some stage
if it hasn't already.
Wireless also leaks other information is is a direct result of some of the
default behaviours of Windows which for example allow a PC to broadcast what
networks it has connected to previously, and also the default to connect ad
hoc (between PC to PC) rather than use infrastructure mode. Such
promiscuous behaviour initiated by Windows is dodgy from a security point of
view. This apsect of wireless security and particularly this update has
been very poorly advertised by Microsoft who don't make this update
available through the Windows Update portal. Unfortunately I haven't the
time to go into this right now here, but anyone wishing to read up on this
specific problem should go here as a starting off point:
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=2726F32F-D52B-4F84-ACE8-F7FC20195769
NAT stands for Network Address Translation, in essence your router provides
only public face to the internet in one I/P address whilst your computers
behind the router have private I/P addresses. In between it is possible to
process and block certain information (eg. a firewall) that gives you some
measure of protection.
Regards.
Tristram Llewellyn
Sight and Sound Technology
Technical Support
www.sightandsound.co.uk
*** BCAB List administration ***
If you wish to unsubscribe, set vacation,, request a digest or carry out
routine maintenance on your subscription to the list then go to:
http://www.bcab.org.uk/mailing-list.html
Alternatively, send an email to bcab-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word faqin
the subject line. You'll receive an email with advice on managing your
subscription to the list.
If you wish to discuss the administration of the list then contact:
bcab-moderators@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References:
- [bcab] Computer security
- From: Charles Crisp
- [bcab] Re: Computer security
- From: Tristram Llewellyn
- [bcab] Re: Computer security
- From: Dorothy Ingram-Gorban
- [bcab] Re: Computer security
- From: Tristram Llewellyn
Other related posts:
- » [bcab] Computer security
- » [bcab] Re: Computer security
- » [bcab] Re: Computer security
- » [bcab] Re: Computer security
- » [bcab] Re: Computer security
- » [bcab] Re: Computer security
- » [bcab] Re: Computer security
- » [bcab] Re: Computer security
- » [bcab] Re: Computer security
- » [bcab] Re: Computer security
- » [bcab] Re: Computer security
- » [bcab] Re: Computer security
- » [bcab] Computer security
- [bcab] Computer security
- From: Charles Crisp
- [bcab] Re: Computer security
- From: Tristram Llewellyn
- [bcab] Re: Computer security
- From: Dorothy Ingram-Gorban
- [bcab] Re: Computer security
- From: Tristram Llewellyn