[bcab] Re: Captchas
- From: <Clive.Lever@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <bcab@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 09:56:38 -0000
Hi all,
in the early nineties, there used to be a dance record based around a sample
of: "If your name's not on the list, you're not coming in". Perhaps any
campaign could obtain permission to use it! (smile)
Best,
Clive
________________________________
From: bcab-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:bcab-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Swan, Henny
Sent: 31 October 2007 09:32
To: bcab@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bcab] Re: Captchas
Hi All,
I've followed with interest your comments and discussion around the use of
CAPTCHA's and also share your concerns.
As part of our work in the RNIB Web Access Team we speak to organisations on a
regular basis about this issue and it certainly seems to be one that is yet
again being hotly debated and for good reason. We have been campaigning for a
while for large organisations to look into ways of securing their sites from
spammers in a way that doesn't put the burden on the user as CAPTCHA's do. Last
week myself and a number of other disability advocates attended a Round Table
hosted by TV Raman over at Google and this very issues was brought up. It was
also flagged that audio CAPTCHA's are as problematic as visual ones.
Inspired by your comments I published last night an article on the RNIB blog
"CAPTCHA's: if your name's not down you're not coming in"
(http://www.rnib.org.uk/wacblog/images/captcha-if-youre-names-not-down-youre-not-coming-in/
<blocked::http://www.rnib.org.uk/wacblog/images/captcha-if-youre-names-not-down-youre-not-coming-in/>
) which looks at the issues around CAPTCHA's, problems and possible solutions.
Feel free to comment on the blog or by all means contact us directly. While we
are acutely aware of the problems and actively advocating change it is always
helpful to us to hear specific concerns and your ideas.
Many thanks, Henny
________________________________
From: bcab-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:bcab-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Clive Lever
Sent: 28 October 2007 01:22
To: bcab@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bcab] Captchas
Hi all,
Since this topic was raised there have been well over 70 messages posted to the
list on the subject in only three days. I also get the feeling from the names
I'm seeing, that the subject has drawn several people to post for the first
time, who may have been "lurking" before. All this goes to show what a hot
topic the Captcha issue is for us. The volume of traffic on the subject could
in itself be used as evidence in any campaign to give sensible alternatives to
the Captcha.
I've just come across a variation on the theme. I tried to create an account
on Google. The good news was that they offered an option to listen to the code
as well as one to type on the graphic contents. The bad news was that when I
clicked on the "listen to the numbers and type them in" link, nothing played.
I visited the help page and sent an email to show that I was having trouble
crating an account, and will be interested to see what follows. However, The
help pages gave me a check list, and yes, my soundcard was working; yes, my PC
supports .wav files; yes, my volume was turned up, but, in the words of Little
Britain, computer says no. Now there's a phrase to be quoted in a campaign!
I would therefore hope, that anyone who arranges for an audio alternative to be
in place would ensure that it is working at all times. This is the equivalent
in D D A terms of the Good practice Guideline from the DRC that cites the
example, that if you have an induction loop in place but it is not working on
the day that a hard-of-hearing customer needs to use it, the service provider
will most likely be found to be liable under the terms of the act. The code of
practice, mentioned in Léonie's overview of the captcha issue, is not in itself
the law, but states in its own introduction that it will be used in evidence,
so has the power to influence any case.
I would of course, not countenance wielding the stick of the D D A against
offending companies, unless all other attempts to get a satisfactory result
have met with resistance or insufficient action to remove the barrier to
access.
Best,
Clive
Click here <https://www.mailcontrol.com/sr/wQw0zmjPoHdJTZGyOCrrhg==> to report
this email as spam.
--
DISCLAIMER:
NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is
confidential and may be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient you
should not use, disclose, distribute or copy any of the content of it or of any
attachment; you are requested to notify the sender immediately of your receipt
of the email and then to delete it and any attachments from your system.
RNIB endeavours to ensure that emails and any attachments generated by its
staff are free from viruses or other contaminants. However, it cannot accept
any responsibility for any such which are transmitted. We therefore recommend
you scan all attachments.
Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email and any
attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of
RNIB.
RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227
Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk
This message has been scanned for viruses by BlackSpider MailControl
<http://www.blackspider.com/>
- Follow-Ups:
- [bcab] Re: Captchas
- From: Dave Taylor
Other related posts:
- » [bcab] Captchas
- » [bcab] Re: Captchas
- » [bcab] Re: Captchas
- » [bcab] Re: Captchas
- » [bcab] Re: Captchas
- » [bcab] Re: Captchas
- » [bcab] Re: Captchas
- » [bcab] Captchas
- » [bcab] Re: Captchas
- » [bcab] Re: Captchas
- » [bcab] Re: Captchas
- » [bcab] Re: Captchas
- » [bcab] Re: Captchas
- » [bcab] Re: Captchas
- » [bcab] Re: Captchas
- » [bcab] Re: Captchas
- » [bcab] Re: Captchas
- » [bcab] Re: Captchas
- » [bcab] Re: Captchas
- » [bcab] Re: Captchas
- » [bcab] Re: Captchas
- [bcab] Re: Captchas
- From: Dave Taylor