[bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- From: "Vince Thacker" <vince@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <bcab@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 18:49:05 -0000
Karina, couldn't agree more. The colour combination you mention sounds
ridiculous.
Contrast is indeed an issue, mentioned in many accessibility contexts.
For example, this is from w3.org's section, "Techniques For Accessibility:
Evaluation And Repair Tools"
"Checkpoint 2.2 - Ensure that foreground and background color combinations
provide sufficient contrast when viewed by someone having color deficits or
when viewed on a black and white screen "
The contrast values can indeed be tested by looking at the numbers or numeric
equivalents of names used for colors. So it's pretty easy to auto-detect this
problem.
I've used the Vision Australia Web Accessibility Toolbar for a long time. One
of the tests included there is a colour contrast test. It's not difficult to
carry this out, so really there's no excuse for getting it wrong. It helps if
you know that the red, green and blue can each range from 0 to 255, and that
the hex digits for those are 00 and FF. That's about all there is to it.
Sadly, I've come across sites put together by blind people who haven't got it
anywhere near right. One had a green background (00FF00), red text (FF0000) and
blue links (0000ff). Well, the FF digits give it away straight away. The text
would be invisible in black and white, and in colour it would at the very least
look yucky.
I don't know for sure, but I'd have thought even automated tests like WebXact
would fail pages with poor colour contrasts.
Of course, it's not as simple as that if you are designing a site for dyslexics
or people who have eye conditions like M D where they get a lot of glare. the
contrast values could be fine, but the site could be a pain to read. I know of
what I speak, believe me.
Vince.
----- Original Message -----
From: Karina Gregory
To: bcab@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Saturday, February 24, 2007 5:50 PM
Subject: [bcab] Accessibility considerations
Hi all,
I've just come across a website that claims to have WAI - AA and WCAG 1.0
having a symbol in the corner of ths creen. The thing that I don't agree with
is the colour contrast - white text on a light blue background. My question is
that when websites are tested by an accessibility website/program for
accessibility, is colour contrast taken into consideration? Surely the colour
schemes to be used can be picked up from the code. If it isn't already taken
into consideration, maybe it could be i nthe future by specifying to the
accessibility tool what is good contrast and what is bad contrast. Do you
follow what I'm saying? For example, if the tool was told that white text on a
light blue background was not good contrast then it woud be able to reject
websites that were accessed using this method.
I'm interested in hearing the views of others on this topic.
Thanks.
Karina
I'm protected by SpamBrave
http://www.spambrave.com/
- Follow-Ups:
- [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- From: Dorothy Ingram-Gorban
- [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- From: Karen Packham
- References:
- [bcab] Accessibility considerations
- From: Karina Gregory
Other related posts:
- » [bcab] Accessibility considerations
- » [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- » [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- » [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- » [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- » [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- » [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- » [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- » [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- » [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- » [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- » [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- » [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- » [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- » [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- » [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- » [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- » [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- » [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- » [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- » [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- » [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- » [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- » [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- » [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- » [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- » [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- » [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- » [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- From: Dorothy Ingram-Gorban
- [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- From: Karen Packham
- [bcab] Accessibility considerations
- From: Karina Gregory