[bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations

Charles Dolphin or supernova is 1 of the 3 true screen readers in the world of the Vips As yet I don't know what apple can do. so you have Jaws made by Freedom and Supernova made by Dolphin a British company. and windowEyes and I forget quite who makes that Steve nutt would know. I do not know much about Zoomtext only that people seemed to move to it who formerly used Magic is a Freedom Product. I have forgotten who makes your product is that also Freedom? I have also heard of a product called something like AI squared. Now I do not know if Zoom and A I squared are similar? I do not know about Wineyes if it works in high contrast black and white I am told Supernova does. I know Jaws does not Dorothy. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Charles Crisp " <charlescrisp@xxxxxxx> 
To: <bcab@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2007 11:08 AM
Subject: [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations


Hi Karina

Light text on dark is probably right for plain text, but for more graphic
layouts the conversion may not be so successful. I don't know Dolphin
software or quite what it does. Zoomtext has a reading mode on the fly which
converts the text in whatever form into black background with a selected
colour text font. This can then be further enlarged for reading.

Other colour combinations particularly those with colour 'overlays' such as
green, yellow or blue can help with particular eye conditions.

Personally I do not attempt to read from the screen, it is quicker to use
the reader.
The biggest fault with the reader is that it will not read 'dialogue boxes',
which is strange because it can be forced to speak using a 'speak it' tool
which works most of the time.


Kind regards

Charles Crisp

See our holiday home website:
www.thecrisps.co.uk/french-house <http://www.thecrisps.co.uk/french-house>



This E mail is private and may contain copyright material in the text or any
attachments.

The contents and attachments of this E mail have been scanned for viruses,
but you may wish to make your own test before oopening attachments.
-----Original Message-----
From: bcab-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:bcab-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Karina Gregory
Sent: 26 February 2007 01:57
To: bcab@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations

Hi Charles,
I would have thought that light text on a darker background would be the
better option for most people, particularly as this would reduce glare.  I'm
sure that others will put me right if I'm wrong.  I don't think there's ever
going to be a solution that can meet everyone.  I suppose that the other
option would be to change the colour preferences within your magnification
softwae, but I don't know about others but sometimes this can be very
confusing as it changes the whole screen and sometimes makes it difficult to
differentiate between the menu bars and other screen content.  I personally
prefer to use the inverted colours offered by Lunar as this identifies the
menus as well as the text much better.  There are some other alternatives
e.g. yellow on blue, light green on dark green, but I find these quite
difficult.  Do other magnification users agree with what Im saying about
being able to differentiate between the menu bars and the other text?
Karina
----- Original Message ----- From: "Charles Crisp " <charlescrisp@xxxxxxx> 
To: <bcab@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2007 10:46 AM
Subject: [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations


Hi all

I've come late to this discussion.

One of the problems with screen colours which are fixed to any standard is
that some eye conditions are variable and one set of colour and contrast may
not suit everyone.
Someone mentioned the BBC and they have the 'My web, my way' web site at

http://www.bbc.co.uk/accessibility/

This contains advice on how to change the screen colours and contrast for
individual preference.

Perhaps it is more important to have a standard that will allow all screen
readers perform better, and we all know how difficult this can be.


Kind regards

Charles Crisp

See our holiday home website:
www.thecrisps.co.uk/french-house <http://www.thecrisps.co.uk/french-house>



This E mail is private and may contain copyright material in the text or any
attachments.

The contents and attachments of this E mail have been scanned for viruses,
but you may wish to make your own test before oopening attachments.
-----Original Message-----
From: bcab-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:bcab-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Léonie Watson
Sent: 24 February 2007 22:21
To: bcab@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations

Karen,

   You're absolutely right about the fact that many agencies are
unscrupulous about the quality of service they deliver. It's one of the many
reasons that reading PAS 78 is such a good idea:
http://www.drc-gb.org/library/website_accessibility_guidance/pas_78.aspx

   For people who are commissioning websites, but know little about web
accessibility, PAS 78 is a great place to start understanding the basics. It
even includes a checklist of questions to ask prospective agencies before
you hire them.

   Additionally, it talks about the need for ensuring that the level of
accessibility required is explicitly mentioned in the contract you have with
the agency. That way, if it comes to light at a later point that your
website is not accessible, you have legal recourse to resolve the problem.


Regards,
Léonie.

________________________________

From: bcab-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:bcab-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Karen Packham
Sent: 24 February 2007 21:03
To: bcab@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations


I sometimes help organisations with their websites, and sadly I know that
some of them (or more probably their web agencies) will put the
accessibility logos on their sites because they believe certain testing
tools are all they need to use, and they don't actually read the
accessibility guidelines.

Others say they are "working towards accessibility", so they say it's
cheaper for them to have the logo on the website from the start, or else
they will have to pay the agency to add it later. And others are simply
misled by their agencies completely.

Colour contrast is definitely one thing that inexperienced organisations are
surprised to hear about, so I'd suggest you contact them to explain the
issue and ask them to confirm when they will fix it, as this nudge may be
all that is needed.

What would be good is some way of publicising the names of agencies that do
mislead their clients in this respect. The odd mistake is understandable,
but what some of them get away with is outrageous. In the end their clients
are the ones who end up taking all the flack, whereas the agency is
invisible and only beholden to their client, who will have trusted them to
have (and paid for) the skills that the organisation lacked.

Hope this helps and sorry for the rant!

Karen

________________________________

From: bcab-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:bcab-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of Vince Thacker
Sent: 24 February 2007 18:49
To: bcab@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations


Karina, couldn't agree more.  The colour combination you mention sounds
ridiculous.

Contrast is indeed an issue, mentioned in many accessibility contexts.

For example, this is from w3.org's section, "Techniques For Accessibility:
Evaluation And Repair Tools"

"Checkpoint 2.2 - Ensure that foreground and background color combinations
provide sufficient contrast when viewed by someone having color deficits or
when viewed on a black and white screen "

The contrast values can indeed be tested by looking at the numbers or
numeric equivalents of names used for colors. So it's pretty easy to
auto-detect this problem.

I've used the Vision Australia Web Accessibility Toolbar for a long time.
One of the tests included there is a colour contrast test. It's not
difficult to carry this out, so really there's no excuse for getting it
wrong. It helps if you know that the red, green and blue can each range from
0 to 255, and that the hex digits for those are 00 and FF. That's about all
there is to it.

Sadly, I've come across sites put together by blind people who haven't got
it anywhere near right. One had a green background (00FF00), red text
(FF0000) and blue links (0000ff). Well, the FF digits give it away straight
away. The text would be invisible in black and white, and in colour it would
at the very least look yucky.

I don't know for sure, but I'd have thought even automated tests like
WebXact would fail pages with poor colour contrasts.

Of course, it's not as simple as that if you are designing a site for
dyslexics or people who have eye conditions like M D where they get a lot of
glare. the contrast values could be fine, but the site could be a pain to
read. I know of what I speak, believe me.

Vince.
----- Original Message ----- From: Karina Gregory <mailto:karina.gregory@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
To: bcab@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Saturday, February 24, 2007 5:50 PM
Subject: [bcab] Accessibility considerations

Hi all,

I've just come across a website that claims to have WAI - AA and
WCAG 1.0 having a symbol in the corner of ths creen.  The thing that I don't
agree with is the colour contrast - white text on a light blue background.
My question is that when websites are tested by an accessibility
website/program for accessibility, is colour contrast taken into
consideration?  Surely the colour schemes to be used can be picked up from
the code.  If it isn't already taken into consideration, maybe it could be i
nthe future by specifying to the accessibility tool what is good contrast
and what is bad contrast.  Do you follow what I'm saying?  For example, if
the tool was told that white text on a light blue background was not good
contrast then it woud be able to reject websites that were accessed using
this method.

I'm interested in hearing the views of others on this topic.

Thanks.

Karina

I'm protected by SpamBrave <http://www.spambrave.com/>


***  BCAB List administration ***

If you wish to unsubscribe, set vacation,, request a digest or carry out
routine maintenance on your subscription to the list then go to:
http://www.bcab.org.uk/mailing-list.html

Alternatively, send an email to bcab-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
faqin the subject line. You'll receive an email with advice on managing your
subscription to the list.

If you wish to discuss the administration of the list then contact:
bcab-moderators@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

***  BCAB List administration ***

If you wish to unsubscribe, set vacation,, request a digest or carry out
routine maintenance on your subscription to the list then go to:
http://www.bcab.org.uk/mailing-list.html

Alternatively, send an email to bcab-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word
faqin the subject line. You'll receive an email with advice on managing your
subscription to the list.

If you wish to discuss the administration of the list then contact:
bcab-moderators@xxxxxxxxxxxxx


***  BCAB List administration ***
If you wish to unsubscribe, set vacation,, request a digest or carry out routine maintenance on your subscription to the list then go to: 
http://www.bcab.org.uk/mailing-list.html
Alternatively, send an email to bcab-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word faqin the subject line. You'll receive an email with advice on managing your subscription to the list. 

If you wish to discuss the administration of the list then contact:
bcab-moderators@xxxxxxxxxxxxx



--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.4/702 - Release Date: 25/02/2007 15:16 


***  BCAB List administration ***

If you wish to unsubscribe, set vacation,, request a digest or carry out 
routine maintenance on your subscription to the list then go to:
http://www.bcab.org.uk/mailing-list.html

Alternatively, send an email to bcab-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word faqin 
the subject line. You'll receive an email with advice on managing your 
subscription to the list.

If you wish to discuss the administration of the list then contact:
bcab-moderators@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Other related posts: