[bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- From: "Dorothy Ingram-Gorban" <dorothy.ingram-gorban@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: <bcab@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 18:15:48 -0000
Hallo there.
I wonder which screen reader you are using ? I think a lot depnds on this.
dorothy
----- Original Message -----
From: "Karina Gregory" <karina.gregory@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <bcab@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, February 24, 2007 5:50 PM
Subject: [bcab] Accessibility considerations
Hi all,
I've just come across a website that claims to have WAI - AA and WCAG 1.0
having a symbol in the corner of ths creen. The thing that I don't agree
with is the colour contrast - white text on a light blue background. My
question is that when websites are tested by an accessibility
website/program for accessibility, is colour contrast taken into
consideration? Surely the colour schemes to be used can be picked up from
the code. If it isn't already taken into consideration, maybe it could be i
nthe future by specifying to the accessibility tool what is good contrast
and what is bad contrast. Do you follow what I'm saying? For example, if
the tool was told that white text on a light blue background was not good
contrast then it woud be able to reject websites that were accessed using
this method.
I'm interested in hearing the views of others on this topic.
Thanks.
Karina
*** BCAB List administration ***
If you wish to unsubscribe, set vacation,, request a digest or carry out
routine maintenance on your subscription to the list then go to:
http://www.bcab.org.uk/mailing-list.html
Alternatively, send an email to bcab-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word faqin
the subject line. You'll receive an email with advice on managing your
subscription to the list.
If you wish to discuss the administration of the list then contact:
bcab-moderators@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Follow-Ups:
- [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- From: Karina Gregory
- References:
- [bcab] Accessibility considerations
- From: Karina Gregory
Other related posts:
- » [bcab] Accessibility considerations
- » [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- » [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- » [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- » [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- » [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- » [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- » [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- » [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- » [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- » [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- » [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- » [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- » [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- » [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- » [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- » [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- » [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- » [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- » [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- » [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- » [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- » [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- » [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- » [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- » [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- » [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- » [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- » [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- From: Karina Gregory
- [bcab] Accessibility considerations
- From: Karina Gregory