[bcab] Accessibility considerations
- From: "Karina Gregory" <karina.gregory@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <bcab@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 17:50:35 -0000
Hi all,
I've just come across a website that claims to have WAI - AA and WCAG 1.0
having a symbol in the corner of ths creen. The thing that I don't agree with
is the colour contrast - white text on a light blue background. My question is
that when websites are tested by an accessibility website/program for
accessibility, is colour contrast taken into consideration? Surely the colour
schemes to be used can be picked up from the code. If it isn't already taken
into consideration, maybe it could be i nthe future by specifying to the
accessibility tool what is good contrast and what is bad contrast. Do you
follow what I'm saying? For example, if the tool was told that white text on a
light blue background was not good contrast then it woud be able to reject
websites that were accessed using this method.
I'm interested in hearing the views of others on this topic.
Thanks.
Karina
- Follow-Ups:
- [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- From: Dorothy Ingram-Gorban
- [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- From: Vince Thacker
- [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- From: Léonie Watson
Other related posts:
- » [bcab] Accessibility considerations
- » [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- » [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- » [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- » [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- » [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- » [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- » [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- » [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- » [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- » [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- » [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- » [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- » [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- » [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- » [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- » [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- » [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- » [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- » [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- » [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- » [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- » [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- » [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- » [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- » [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- » [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- » [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- » [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- From: Dorothy Ingram-Gorban
- [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- From: Vince Thacker
- [bcab] Re: Accessibility considerations
- From: Léonie Watson