[AZ-Observing] Re: Telrad stellar limit

Digital setting circles?  You did not mention that originally.  I have a =
20x80 finder as well as a Telrad for my C11.  I used to use both when =
I'd go out to the desert, but on the last four trips, I left the finder =
at home and got along just fine.  Once you align on two or more =
calibration stars, DSCs take all the guesswork and star hopping out of =
it allowing you to navigate with ease. =20

And please, no one jump my case about not star hopping. I did that for =
20 years and decided with what time I have left on this earth to take =
the express jet to the fun spots and enjoy myself.


Richard Harshaw
Cave Creek, AZ


-----Original Message-----
From: az-observing-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx =
[mailto:az-observing-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of AJ Crayon
Sent: Monday, April 21, 2008 2:06 PM
To: az-observing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: cal_donley@xxxxxxx
Subject: [AZ-Observing] Re: Telrad stellar limit

Mike, the primary reason for replacing the finder with Telrad is for =
easier=20
recalibration of digital setting circles.  Currently some bright deep =
sky=20
object that can be seen in the finder is used.  For me, the finder is =
rather=20
awkward to aim and I want something that is easier and the Telrad fits =
this=20
nicely.  Instead of deep sky objects, bright stars can be used.  My =
concern=20
was the magnitude limit and this discussion has adequately answered that =

question for me.  The Telrad is adequate, in fact it is more than =
adequate.

Secondary reasons are, as you indicated, space and balance.

I'm now in market for Telrad and will put finder up for sale, but only =
after=20
selecting some bright stars for alignment and loading them into the XP4 =
Sky=20
Commander.

Thanks to all for your excellent comments and in sight.

AJ Crayon
Phoenix, AZ


--
See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please 
send personal replies to the author, not the list.

Other related posts: