[AZ-Observing] Re: Sunday not too hot either....
- From: "Ken Reeves" <kreeves@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: az-observing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 20:43:11 -0700
I got Stan's second reply, but not the first.
Ken
"Stanley A. Gorodenski" wrote: Interesting. As yet I've not received a copy
of what I sent below. I
know others received it because I got 'out of the office' replies. I
think this is a problem with the Az-Observing server.
Stan
Stanley A. Gorodenski wrote:
> This time I got the original, but sometimes, not too frequenly, I do
> not. It would be nice to know what is causing this.
> Stan
>
--
See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please
send personal replies to the author, not the list.
- References:
- [AZ-Observing] Re: Sunday not too hot either....
- From: Brian Skiff
- [AZ-Observing] Re: Sunday not too hot either....
- From: Ken Reeves
- [AZ-Observing] Re: Sunday not too hot either....
- From: Stanley A. Gorodenski
- [AZ-Observing] Re: Sunday not too hot either....
- From: Stanley A. Gorodenski
Other related posts:
- » [AZ-Observing] Sunday not too hot either....
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Sunday not too hot either....
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Sunday not too hot either....
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Sunday not too hot either....
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Sunday not too hot either....
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Sunday not too hot either....
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Sunday not too hot either....
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Sunday not too hot either....
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Sunday not too hot either....
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Sunday not too hot either....
- [AZ-Observing] Re: Sunday not too hot either....
- From: Brian Skiff
- [AZ-Observing] Re: Sunday not too hot either....
- From: Ken Reeves
- [AZ-Observing] Re: Sunday not too hot either....
- From: Stanley A. Gorodenski
- [AZ-Observing] Re: Sunday not too hot either....
- From: Stanley A. Gorodenski