[AZ-Observing] Re: Recording Seeing Conditions (was WOW!)
- From: <rtejera@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <az-observing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 11:09:53 -0400
Brian,
I think we're looking at this issue from differing perspectives. From my =
point of view, like Andrew, I'm just looking for a way to compare one =
night with the next when I go back through my notes. The 1-10 scale =
works well for this. It's been implied that this scale is very =
arbitrary, but I would say, while not Scientifically valid it does have =
certain guidelines to go by. Quoting from Steve's Definitions a 7 in =
transparency is:" fainter stars, equal to mag 6.0 are seen and the =
fainter parts of the Milky way are seen with averted vision, Zodiacal =
Light Seen With averted vision" An 8: "Stars fainter than mag 6.0 are =
just seen and the fainter parts of the Milky Way are more obvious, =
Zodiacal Light is seen with direct vision"
Given these definitions, the night in question was an 8, as I could =
easily make the Milky Way well into Cassiopeia.=20
I'll agree, this isn't scientific, but then I'm in it for the fun of it. =
I also don't have the opportunity to this every night.=20
Don't get me wrong, no one on this list values your input & knowledge =
more than me, but I think this is a case of Keep it simple. From your =
perspective, simple isn't scientifically acceptable, and you're used to =
taking these measurements on a regular basis. For me it's just easier to =
look up and say Looks like a 7. :)
Rick
-----Original Message-----
From: az-observing-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:az-observing-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Brian Skiff
Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2005 2:03 PM
To: az-observing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [AZ-Observing] Re: Recording Seeing Conditions (was WOW!)
Obviously I'm in the minority in this discussion, and will simply
say that I don't find it to be nearly as complicated as others are =
making
it out to be. For what they're worth, the list of pairs I've used for
estimating seeing is here:
ftp://ftp.lowell.edu/pub/bas/dbls.fil
...and a file of estimates made mainly in the 1980s with the 7-inch
guidescope attached to the 'Pluto Camera', which I made while taking
plates with that instrument:
ftp://ftp.lowell.edu/pub/bas/seeing.vis
\Brian
--
See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and =
please=20
send personal replies to the author, not the list.
--
See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please
send personal replies to the author, not the list.
- Follow-Ups:
- [AZ-Observing] Re: Recording Seeing Conditions (was WOW!)
- From: Stanley A. Gorodenski
Other related posts:
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Recording Seeing Conditions (was WOW!)
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Recording Seeing Conditions (was WOW!)
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Recording Seeing Conditions (was WOW!)
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Recording Seeing Conditions (was WOW!)
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Recording Seeing Conditions (was WOW!)
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Recording Seeing Conditions (was WOW!)
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Recording Seeing Conditions (was WOW!)
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Recording Seeing Conditions (was WOW!)
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Recording Seeing Conditions (was WOW!)
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Recording Seeing Conditions (was WOW!)
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Recording Seeing Conditions (was WOW!)
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Recording Seeing Conditions (was WOW!)
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Recording Seeing Conditions (was WOW!)
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Recording Seeing Conditions (was WOW!)
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Recording Seeing Conditions (was WOW!)
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Recording Seeing Conditions (was WOW!)
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Recording Seeing Conditions (was WOW!)
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Recording Seeing Conditions (was WOW!)
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Recording Seeing Conditions (was WOW!)
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Recording Seeing Conditions (was WOW!)
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Recording Seeing Conditions (was WOW!)
- [AZ-Observing] Re: Recording Seeing Conditions (was WOW!)
- From: Stanley A. Gorodenski