[AZ-Observing] Re: Recording Seeing Conditions (was WOW!)
- From: Andrew Cooper <acooper@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: az-observing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 08:08:32 -0700
I have considered using doubles, it would certainly be more accurate as
Brian suggests as it removes some of the viewer's subjective judgment.
I have used that method a couple times, much too much trouble for the
information I need to record. You have to find two or three doubles
that are appropriately spaced for that night's seeing and high in the
sky. This exercise takes more than a few minutes, a good set of double
star lists at the scope for each month and as a result doesn't routinely
get done.
For my notes I need a quick method and one that says; great, good, OK,
bad, terrible. A single star method like Pickering provides that
information. So that's what I use.
As for using the telescope to determine transparency, this does have
some merit. But again you run into technical issues. You would need a
set of good charts, maybe a dozen, placed across the sky so that one or
another would be near zenith at any given time. I use an 18" telescope
so I would need charts to 16th mag, not trivial, none of my portable
charts go near this. Maybe some AAVSO fields would do the trick. I'll
continue to use naked eye I think.
Andrew
Brian Skiff wrote:
> Andrew wrote:
>
>
>>> We need something, I am not always going to hook in a CCD camera and do
>>> a measurement of the FWHM to figure out the seeing in arcseconds.
>>>
>>>
>
> No one's mentioned CCD imaging or FWHM in this thread until now.
>
>
>
>>> ...standing by a telescope I need something, and it needs to be quick,
>>> simple and need not be horribly accurate. The only important thing
>>> that it be reasonably consistent.
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
>>> Looking at a star at high mag and
>>> looking at zenith with a star chart in hand fits the bill.
>>>
>>>
>
> In case others besides Andrew have misconstrued what I'm trying
>to get at, rephrase the above quote as follows:
>
> Looking at a [double] star at high mag and
> looking [through the telescope] at zenith with a star chart in hand...
>
>\Brian
>--
>See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please
>send personal replies to the author, not the list.
>
>
>
>
>
--
Andrew Cooper
----------------------------------------------------
http://www.siowl.com
--
See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please
send personal replies to the author, not the list.
- References:
- [AZ-Observing] Re: Recording Seeing Conditions (was WOW!)
- From: Brian Skiff
Other related posts:
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Recording Seeing Conditions (was WOW!)
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Recording Seeing Conditions (was WOW!)
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Recording Seeing Conditions (was WOW!)
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Recording Seeing Conditions (was WOW!)
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Recording Seeing Conditions (was WOW!)
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Recording Seeing Conditions (was WOW!)
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Recording Seeing Conditions (was WOW!)
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Recording Seeing Conditions (was WOW!)
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Recording Seeing Conditions (was WOW!)
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Recording Seeing Conditions (was WOW!)
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Recording Seeing Conditions (was WOW!)
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Recording Seeing Conditions (was WOW!)
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Recording Seeing Conditions (was WOW!)
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Recording Seeing Conditions (was WOW!)
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Recording Seeing Conditions (was WOW!)
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Recording Seeing Conditions (was WOW!)
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Recording Seeing Conditions (was WOW!)
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Recording Seeing Conditions (was WOW!)
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Recording Seeing Conditions (was WOW!)
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Recording Seeing Conditions (was WOW!)
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Recording Seeing Conditions (was WOW!)
- [AZ-Observing] Re: Recording Seeing Conditions (was WOW!)
- From: Brian Skiff