[AZ-Observing] Re: Rapid motion binary stars
- From: Brian Skiff <bas@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: az-observing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 12:26:36 -0700 (MST)
gamma Vir has already passed periastron, and is widening out.
The orbit quoted by Steve is incorrect, and there was a later one
(but published before it closed in) that had it right (periastron
was last April or May).
More generally, I'm not sure quoting ranges that extend out a century
or more are all that relevant to a list like Steve's. Not only are
such long-period orbits likely to be wrong, but what I would want as
an observer is simply two ephemeris points: one for "now" and another
one maybe 10 years downstream (maybe 5 if it's really moving, which
probably none besides gamma Vir will be).
\Brian
--
See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please
send personal replies to the author, not the list.
- Follow-Ups:
- [AZ-Observing] Re: Rapid motion binary stars
- From: Steve Coe
- [AZ-Observing] Re: Rapid motion binary stars
- From: Steve Coe
Other related posts:
- » [AZ-Observing] Rapid motion binary stars
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Rapid motion binary stars
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Rapid motion binary stars
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Rapid motion binary stars
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Rapid motion binary stars
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Rapid motion binary stars
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Rapid motion binary stars
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Rapid motion binary stars
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Rapid motion binary stars
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Rapid motion binary stars
- [AZ-Observing] Re: Rapid motion binary stars
- From: Steve Coe
- [AZ-Observing] Re: Rapid motion binary stars
- From: Steve Coe