[AZ-Observing] Re: Radians?
- From: "Steve Coe" <stevecoe@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: <az-observing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 21:00:39 -0700
Beevo, et al;
Dave Fredericksen has a 10mm Radian and it is an excellent eyepiece, =
good
contrast, flat field of view, stars are points across the entire field =
of
view. Besides the obvious price drawback, the only thing I can saw is =
that
they are a somewhat narrow field eyepiece. However, that is quite
irrelevant if you plan to use them on the Moon and planets.
Steve Coe
-----Original Message-----
From: az-observing-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:az-observing-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Bill VanOrden
Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2005 8:26 PM
To: az-observing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [AZ-Observing] Re: Radians?
I spent some time one excellent night comparing the 18mm Radian to the =
Meade
SWA 18mm
They are very similar in most ways.
I thought the Radian to be the better eyepiece.
This is all subjective.
Beevo (aka Bill VanOrden)
Tempe, AZ
--
See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and =
please=20
send personal replies to the author, not the list.
--
See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please
send personal replies to the author, not the list.
- References:
- [AZ-Observing] Re: Radians?
- From: Bill VanOrden
Other related posts:
- » [AZ-Observing] Radians?
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Radians?
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Radians?
- [AZ-Observing] Re: Radians?
- From: Bill VanOrden