[AZ-Observing] Re: [OT] over-quoting issue, was - Re: 3,000 images -- 3,000 words

Now you've really confused them :-P

Tim

On Nov 3, 2009, at 5:37 PM, Jack Jones wrote:

> Hey that's great! Good luck with that.
>
> Jack (no relation) Jones
>
> Tim Jones wrote:
>
>> Nope :-) - that's just the way an email should be handled.  Note that
>
>> of my reply is easy to follow.  Remember, not everyone has read the
>
>> excess content keeps the thread flowing and helps lessen confusion.
>>
>>> What yer missing is that the over-quote limit is set ridiculously
>
>>> long. It was arbitrarily set at that level in the beginning and was
>
>>> in the past, but always dropped after all the whining stopped, as
>
>>> be less noticeable in the future.
>>
>> But, if you voluntarily trim the excess fat off your posts, the limit
>
>> reply to the reply to the original poster 8-).
>>
>> Also note that the trimming of the post results in a message that is
>
>>
>> something completely different...
>>
>> Tim

--
See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please 
send personal replies to the author, not the list.

Other related posts: