[AZ-Observing] Re: North Polar magnitude sequence
- From: "Matt Luttinen" <mluttinen@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: az-observing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2003 00:18:26 -0700
Perhaps a few of the smaller/easier regions might be useful, like #4, or #6.
Maybe some ambitious individual might come up with some new alternatives
using smaller, better defined regions . . .
The idea of just counting stars has some appeal, as long as I don't run out
of fingers and toes . . .
Matt
--
See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please
send personal replies to the author, not the list.
- References:
- [AZ-Observing] Re: North Polar magnitude sequence
- From: Brian Skiff
Other related posts:
- » [AZ-Observing] North Polar magnitude sequence
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: North Polar magnitude sequence
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: North Polar magnitude sequence
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: North Polar magnitude sequence
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: North Polar magnitude sequence
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: North Polar magnitude sequence
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: North Polar magnitude sequence
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: North Polar magnitude sequence
- [AZ-Observing] Re: North Polar magnitude sequence
- From: Brian Skiff