[AZ-Observing] Re: NGC 709
- From: "Ken Reeves" <kreeves@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: az-observing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 00:15:08 -0700
Jack Jones wrote: Then out of the thousands you picked one of the most
interesting. I find
this galaxy group (Abell 262) fascinating. The 714-717 pair is a striking
arrangement of twin edge-ons. I guess I just like galaxy clusters. The other
ones I tussled with were Hickson 93 and Abell 2572. They're in a Nov 2003
S&T article. Yes, that's one thing I really like about having a huge list
without a lot of prior research on it, I often even usually come up with
something really interesting.
--
See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please
send personal replies to the author, not the list.
- References:
- [AZ-Observing] Sunday at Flatiron
- From: Ken Reeves
- [AZ-Observing] Re: Sunday at Flatiron
- From: Jack Jones
- [AZ-Observing] NGC 709
- From: Ken Reeves
- [AZ-Observing] Re: NGC 709
- From: Jack Jones
Other related posts:
- » [AZ-Observing] NGC 709
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: NGC 709
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: NGC 709
- [AZ-Observing] Sunday at Flatiron
- From: Ken Reeves
- [AZ-Observing] Re: Sunday at Flatiron
- From: Jack Jones
- [AZ-Observing] NGC 709
- From: Ken Reeves
- [AZ-Observing] Re: NGC 709
- From: Jack Jones