[AZ-Observing] Re: NGC 709
- From: "Jack Jones" <spicastar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <az-observing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 23:40:58 -0700
Then out of the thousands you picked one of the most interesting. I find
this galaxy group (Abell 262) fascinating. The 714-717 pair is a striking
arrangement of twin edge-ons. I guess I just like galaxy clusters. The other
ones I tussled with were Hickson 93 and Abell 2572. They're in a Nov 2003
S&T article.
Jack Jones
Public Events
Saguaro Astronomy Club
Phoenix AZ
spicastar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
www.saguaroastro.org
Jack said:
> In re: 14.2 mag NGC 709, maybe higher power, 250-300x, might have done it.
> The galaxy is midway between two equally bright (or equally dim) stars. I
> caught it at AZ City in October near the meridian in my 14.5" at 200x.
Ken said:
> The problem was i had misidentified 714 as 709, as Vickers doesn't go
all
> the way to 714. I had done no research or preparation for this group
ahead
> of time, it was just that 708 was on my list of thousands of objects to
> observe.
--
See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please
send personal replies to the author, not the list.
- Follow-Ups:
- [AZ-Observing] Re: NGC 709
- From: Ken Reeves
- [AZ-Observing] List of objects (was NGC 709)
- From: Ken Reeves
- References:
- [AZ-Observing] Sunday at Flatiron
- From: Ken Reeves
- [AZ-Observing] Re: Sunday at Flatiron
- From: Jack Jones
- [AZ-Observing] NGC 709
- From: Ken Reeves
Other related posts:
- » [AZ-Observing] NGC 709
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: NGC 709
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: NGC 709
- [AZ-Observing] Re: NGC 709
- From: Ken Reeves
- [AZ-Observing] List of objects (was NGC 709)
- From: Ken Reeves
- [AZ-Observing] Sunday at Flatiron
- From: Ken Reeves
- [AZ-Observing] Re: Sunday at Flatiron
- From: Jack Jones
- [AZ-Observing] NGC 709
- From: Ken Reeves