[AZ-Observing] Re: Murphy and his Law
- From: Bob Erdmann <bobe@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: az-observing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 04:33:54 -0700
It's really O'Tools law that is the more relevant. Stated, it says:
"Murphy was an optimist"
/Bob
Steve Coe wrote:
>All;
>
>Murphy at his best. I go out of town for a three night observing
>session and return to find that in that period of time I needed to
>register my Norton AntiSpam program and had NOT done that in a timely
>manner.
>
>So, I returned to 185 emails..you know what most of them are.
>
>Needless to say, it took a while to wade through the morass and find the
>messages I really wanted to read. I found that 22 of the messages were
>really from folks I wanted to chat with.
>
>Anyway, my spam filter is up and working nicely, NOW;
>Steve Coe
>
>--
>See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please
>send personal replies to the author, not the list.
>
>
>.
>
>
>
--
See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please
send personal replies to the author, not the list.
- References:
- [AZ-Observing] Murphy and his Law
- From: Steve Coe
Other related posts:
- » [AZ-Observing] Murphy and his Law
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Murphy and his Law
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Murphy and his Law
- [AZ-Observing] Murphy and his Law
- From: Steve Coe