[AZ-Observing] Re: Marathon: Early Report
- From: Stan Gorodenski <stan_gorodenski@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: az-observing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 26 Mar 2006 10:54:32 -0700
Impressive.
Stan
Tom Polakis wrote:
>The night turned out to be about 75% cloudy, but that didn't stop quite a few
>of us from running the marathon. Somebody counted 110 or so vehicles, which
>isn't bad for such an obviously murky night. I heard a couple reports of 107,
>but no perfect scores yet. I would not be dubious, though, as somebody could
>have looked at M74 or M30 at the right instant as it passed between clouds.
>
>Here's my personal account. I saw 105 Messier objects last night. It was one
>my the most challenging nights of observing.
>
>I failed to see M74, but it was in the clear for a few minutes when it was
>dark enough, so maybe a larger aperture than 70mm would have pulled it in. In
>the early evening, it was apparent that the north was going to go away fast,
>so I worked on sweeping up all of the object of high declination through Ursa
>Major before even going after Orion through Puppis, where it was very clear.
>M33 was extremely difficult and fleeting, and I bet a lot of folks missed it.
>I wonder if anybody got M31 and its two companions. I had to wait until
>morning, when I failed to see it again.
>
>I did all of my viewing at 18x in the Pronto, so some objects like M76 took
>real effort to detect. And some galaxies between clouds were tougher than I
>was expecting. All of the open clusters in Messiers catalogue were beautimous
>in the little refractor.
>
>At 10:20, it had cleared completely, and stayed good for a couple hours, when
>I was able to cruise through the galaxies in Virgo and Coma. At 11:00, I had
>61 objects, and napped through 3:00, when I was greeted by more mostly cloudy.
> I took on the last dozen objects in a strange order, dictated entirely by
>local clearings. I managed to see M73 but not M72, doing the same for M55,
>while missing M75. I was able to get M72 and M75 just before twilight, and
>just barely.
>
>I could believe that M30 also became visible at some point, but I was messing
>with M72 at the time and didn't get to it. So I wound up with 105, missing
>M74, M31, M32, M110, and M30. Glad I made the trip, as it was an enjoyable
>night.
>
>I hope some other observers had a chance to point the scope at the rising
>crescent moon, which looked great when the bands of clouds were passing in
>front of it.
>
>Tom
>
>--
>See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please
>send personal replies to the author, not the list.
>
>
>
>
>
--
See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please
send personal replies to the author, not the list.
- Follow-Ups:
- [AZ-Observing] Re: Marathon: Early Report
- From: Jimmy Ray
- References:
- [AZ-Observing] Marathon: Early Report
- From: Tom Polakis
Other related posts:
- » [AZ-Observing] Marathon: Early Report
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Marathon: Early Report
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Marathon: Early Report
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Marathon: Early Report
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Marathon: Early Report
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Marathon: Early Report
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Marathon: Early Report
- [AZ-Observing] Re: Marathon: Early Report
- From: Jimmy Ray
- [AZ-Observing] Marathon: Early Report
- From: Tom Polakis