[AZ-Observing] Re: Images of Occultation of Venus
- From: "Wayne (aka Mr. Galaxy)" <mrgalaxy@xxxxxxxx>
- To: az-observing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 23:34:17 GMT
15480 Empire Rd.
Benson, AZ 85602
hm ph: 520-586-2244
I just had a chance to view your exquisite video of the Venus occultation, Tom
(and, I assume, Jennifer!). Interesting is the spillover (irradiance, according
to Gene) of Venus' image onto the moon's surface in your imagery. I understand
some people saw the effect visually though I did not, mostly, I suspect because
I had a large enough image scale with my 13-inch f/5.5 telescope and 16mm
eyepiece.
One effect that occurred to me to try and see was a Venusian green flash as the
last remnants of its disk disappeared behind the moon. Comments as to why or
why not the phenomenon should or should not have been expected would be
appreciated. The moon doesn't have an atmosphere, of course, while the earth
does and is the reason why we see the green flash happen with the sun from our
vantage point on earth. Venus does have a very thick atmosphere and even though
it is disappearing behind the sharp edge of the atmosphereless moon I would
have thought that some effect should have been seen.
I was fascinated by how easy Venus was able to be seen after the sun had risen,
especially with the moon being used as a reference, and also the clouds, when
they were our of the way!
Clear skies,
Wayne (aka Mr. Galaxy)
---------- Original Message ----------
From: Tom Polakis <tpolakis@xxxxxxx>
To: AZ-Observing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [AZ-Observing] Images of Occultation of Venus
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 0:45:46 -0400
Here are some images of the beautimous Venus occultation that occurred this
morning.
http://www.pbase.com/polakis/venusmoon0409
I used a 70-200mm lens with a 20D, and then attached the 20D to a TV101
refractor. The Webcam was in the 10" at prime focus, and I recorded ingress,
but missed egress.
Thanks to Rick Tejera for the excellent description. I don't have much more to
add. All aspects of the event were pleasing views through the little Pronto,
and the naked eye view was great as well.
Post-processing the video, I see that the entire ingress took roughly 4800
frames, which would correspond to 80 seconds at 60 fps.
Tom
--
See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please
send personal replies to the author, not the list.
____________________________________________________________
Can't pay your bills? Click here to learn about filing for bankruptcy.
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2141/fc/BLSrjpTLjhZ7yCUjbfJU5cBB8Ph5XsNQrIH1WXYUUMxzFIKlpVoOpMxPh2Q/
--
See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please
send personal replies to the author, not the list.
Other related posts: