[AZ-Observing] Re: Delta Sco Fading
- From: Brian Skiff <Brian.Skiff@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: az-observing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 13:58:15 -0700 (MST)
>> Delta Sco Results
>> JD 2,453,501,8201 2453501.8201, yes?
>> V= 2.028 SD= 0.006
>> B= 2.144 SD= 0.008
>> U= 1.262 SD= 0.018
Since I'm a photometrist, I tend to think in V mags and colors,
rather than separate magnitudes, so: B-V = +0.12 and U-B = -0.88.
The usual colors of the star are B-V = -0.11 and U-B = -0.90, and
V = 2.32. So evidently the star is still brighter than normal,
and the U-B color seems the same, but B-V is much redder. Is that
possible?
\Brian
--
See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please
send personal replies to the author, not the list.
- Follow-Ups:
- [AZ-Observing] Re: Delta Sco Fading
- From: Jeff Hopkins
Other related posts:
- » [AZ-Observing] Delta Sco Fading
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Delta Sco Fading
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Delta Sco Fading
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Delta Sco Fading
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Delta Sco Fading
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Delta Sco Fading
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Delta Sco Fading
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Delta Sco Fading
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Delta Sco Fading
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Delta Sco Fading
- [AZ-Observing] Re: Delta Sco Fading
- From: Jeff Hopkins