[AZ-Observing] Re: Deep Impact
- From: "Stanley A. Gorodenski" <stan_gorodenski@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: az-observing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2005 23:57:19 -0800
I forgot to add the speed of light. Assuming the below, although in 30
minutes it would subtend an angle of 0.47 arc minutes, it takes about 7
and a half minutes for the sunlight to reach it, and 7 and a half to be
reflected back. So add 15 minutes to the 30 - still above the horizon, I
believe.
Stan
Stanley A. Gorodenski wrote:
>My own thought on this is that any increase in brightness will be the
>result of reflected sunlight from ejecta. The impactor will be traveling
>at 6.3 mi/sec. If it is assumed the ejecta will travel equally as fast
>(for every action there is an opposite and equal reaction), then in one
>minute the ejecta will have traveled 378 miles. In 30 minutes, still
>above the horizon, it will have traveled 11,340 miles. I believe Earth
>is about 83,000,000 miles from the comet. The 11,340 miles substends a
>angle of about 0.47 arc minutes. It would seem this should be able to be
>visually seen, and if not that, the increase in brightness from this
>area should be able to be seen photometrically for sure. Just my own
>guesses.
>Stan
>
>ketelsen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>
>
>
>>Jeff-
>>Do you have an estimate of how fast it may/will brighten? It certainly
>>won't stay above our horizon for very long... Just wondering if an
>>increase in brightness will take minutes or hours.
>>
>>-Dean
>>--
>>See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please
>>send personal replies to the author, not the list.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>--
>See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please
>send personal replies to the author, not the list.
>
>
>
>
>
--
See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please
send personal replies to the author, not the list.
- Follow-Ups:
- [AZ-Observing] Re: Deep Impact
- From: Stanley A. Gorodenski
- References:
- [AZ-Observing] Deep Impact
- From: Jeff Hopkins
- [AZ-Observing] Re: Deep Impact
- From: messier
- [AZ-Observing] Re: Deep Impact
- From: Jeff Hopkins
- [AZ-Observing] Re: Deep Impact
- From: ketelsen
- [AZ-Observing] Re: Deep Impact
- From: Stanley A. Gorodenski
Other related posts:
- » [AZ-Observing] Deep Impact
- » [AZ-Observing] Deep Impact
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Deep Impact
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Deep Impact
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Deep Impact
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Deep Impact
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Deep Impact
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Deep Impact
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Deep Impact
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Deep Impact
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Deep Impact
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Deep Impact
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Deep Impact
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Deep Impact
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Deep Impact
- » [AZ-Observing] Deep Impact
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Deep Impact
- [AZ-Observing] Re: Deep Impact
- From: Stanley A. Gorodenski
- [AZ-Observing] Deep Impact
- From: Jeff Hopkins
- [AZ-Observing] Re: Deep Impact
- From: messier
- [AZ-Observing] Re: Deep Impact
- From: Jeff Hopkins
- [AZ-Observing] Re: Deep Impact
- From: ketelsen
- [AZ-Observing] Re: Deep Impact
- From: Stanley A. Gorodenski