[AZ-Observing] Re: Changes in 17P/Magnitude
- From: Jeff Hopkins <phxjeff@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: az-observing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 13:46:07 -0700
Hello Brian,
I did as you suggested:
Aperture Annulus Magnitude
8 15 2.362
10 18 2.326
12 20 2.341
14 22 2.346
So I would say the V magnitude was 2.34 +/1 0.02.
I'll send you a profile directly.
Jeff
At 11:38 -0700 10/25/2007, Brian Skiff wrote:
>>> This was CCD photometry with aperture diameter of 8 pixels and
>>> annulus at 15 pixels. The is at f/3.3 with 12" objective., with a DSI
>>> Pro camera.
>
>>> Need anything else?
>
> What is the image scale in arcsec per pixel? Almost certainly
>your "sky" annulus is too small. I'd make it so the inner radius
>is _way_ outside the visible comet, like half a degree on the sky
>if you can do that. The typical problem with usual CCD comet
>measurements is that people use relatively narrow fields and end
>up subtracting off a lot of "comet" flux as though it were "sky",
>so the magnitudes are chronically much fainter than than good visual
>estimates (a case where the CCD data is wrong and visual data are
>right).
> Since you can evidently adjust the sky and target apertures,
>make a bunch of them using larger and larger patches centered on
>the comet, but keeping the sky annulus fixed and very much larger
>than the spots for the comet. Make a plot of the increase in
>brightness of the comet as you include greater amounts of the object.
>Once the curve flattens out, then you have a pretty good idea of
>the total brightness.
>
>\Brian
>--
>See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please
>send personal replies to the author, not the list.
--
Jeff Hopkins
HPO SOFT
Counting Photons
http://www.hposoft.com/Astro/astro.html
Hopkins Phoenix Observatory
7812 West Clayton Drive
Phoenix, Arizona 85033-2439 U.S.A.
(623)849-5889
(623) 247-1190 (Fax)
www.hposoft.com
--
See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please
send personal replies to the author, not the list.
- References:
- [AZ-Observing] Re: Changes in 17P/Magnitude
- From: Brian Skiff
Other related posts:
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Changes in 17P/Magnitude
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Changes in 17P/Magnitude
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Changes in 17P/Magnitude
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Changes in 17P/Magnitude
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: Changes in 17P/Magnitude
- [AZ-Observing] Re: Changes in 17P/Magnitude
- From: Brian Skiff