[AZ-Observing] Re: BOLIDE! (photo!)
- From: Stan Gorodenski <stanlep@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: az-observing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 17:49:42 -0700
What is the 'contemporary' definition of a bolide? The definition I
have is:
"A fireball accompanied by one or more audible explosions, often
associated with meteorite falls...Many shock waves may be set up if
considerable fragmentation occurs, causing a rumbling noise which
follows the first major fragmentation"
This definition does not say anything about color. So far no one has
said they heard an explosion (or did I just miss it? - someone said they
heard some sputtering). Is this object really a bolide? Is one or more
explosions assumed to exist even when not heard if it looks and feels
like a bolide to experienced observers? Since it was near polaris, my
guess is that it was somewhere between 30-90 miles from the observer (in
a straight line), and so maybe it would not be possible to hear an
explosion.
Stan
Wil Milan wrote:
>
> All,
>
> I've posted a photo of the huge green bolide that was seen to the north all
> over Arizona Sunday morning. See
>
---
This message is from the AZ-Observing mailing list. If you wish to be
removed from this list, send E-mail to: AZ-Observing-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx,
with the subject: unsubscribe.
The list's archive is at: http://www.freelists.org/archives/az-observing
This is a discussion list. Please send personal inquiries directly to
the message author. In other words, do not use "reply" for personal
messages. Thanks.
- Follow-Ups:
- [AZ-Observing] Re: BOLIDE! (photo!)
- From: Wil Milan
- References:
- [AZ-Observing] Leonids Video
- From: Andrew Cooper
- [AZ-Observing] Re: BOLIDE! (photo!)
- From: Wil Milan
Other related posts:
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: BOLIDE! (photo!)
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: BOLIDE! (photo!)
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: BOLIDE! (photo!)
- [AZ-Observing] Re: BOLIDE! (photo!)
- From: Wil Milan
- [AZ-Observing] Leonids Video
- From: Andrew Cooper
- [AZ-Observing] Re: BOLIDE! (photo!)
- From: Wil Milan