[AZ-Observing] Re: 486 488 501
- From: "Stanley A. Gorodenski" <stan_gorodenski@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: az-observing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 15:06:01 -0800
You're correct. After reading your message I went back and checked
AstroAlert. It escaped my memory, or it did not sink home the first time
I read it, but it said (in parenthesis) that 501 was formerly known as
484 last month.
Stan
Steven Dodder wrote:
>As I understand it, every spot that appears over the limb is assigned a
>number. In this case, 501. Since we can now monitor the sunspots as they
>traverse the back side, we are then able to detect if this spot has made the
>trip before, in this case 501=484. This morning, when I did my sketch, I
>did see the next spot group clearly on the limb, though much foreshortened.
>It seems likely this spot group is the former 488, since that was the next
>strongest group on the last rotation. The "discrepancy" is, and it is not,
>depending on how you look at it, but I'd lean toward the new number, given
>when the system was developed we couldn't watch spots traverse the backside,
>so it was anybody's guess if the spot had made it all the way around. My 2
>cents.
>
>
>
>
--
See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please
send personal replies to the author, not the list.
- References:
- [AZ-Observing] Re: 486 488 501
- From: Steven Dodder
Other related posts:
- » [AZ-Observing] 486 488 501
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: 486 488 501
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: 486 488 501
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: 486 488 501
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: 486 488 501
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: 486 488 501
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: 486 488 501
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: 486 488 501
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: 486 488 501
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: 486 488 501
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: 486 488 501
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: 486 488 501
- » [AZ-Observing] Re: 486 488 501
- [AZ-Observing] Re: 486 488 501
- From: Steven Dodder