atw: SEC: UNCLASSIFIED Re: Is "non-null" an acceptable term?

From: "Silcock, Howard DR" <Howard.Silcock@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "'Austechwriter (E-mail)'" <austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 10:27:49 +1100

I'd definitely say "non-null" is acceptable - or at least non-unacceptable.

      Howard 

              --------------------------------------------------
         Howard L. Silcock
              Technical Writer, EMS Program
               Information Systems Division
             (02) 626 69735  
              --------------------------------------------------


**************************************************
To post a message to austechwriter, send the message to 
austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

To subscribe to austechwriter, send a message to 
austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with "subscribe" in the Subject field.

To unsubscribe, send a message to austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 
"unsubscribe" in the Subject field.

To search the austechwriter archives, go to 
www.freelists.org/archives/austechwriter

To contact the list administrator, send a message to 
austechwriter-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
**************************************************

atw: SEC: UNCLASSIFIED Re: Is "non-null" an acceptable term?

Other related posts: