atw: Re: page numbering - which style to use

I prefer A every time, but that may be because I have been
accustomed to sending out additional looseleaf chapters as
software modules have been developed. I have also worked
where looseleaf pages are printed from the change onwards
for chapters, thus potentially changing the page numbers for
sections and subsections within a chapter. Using method A
allows for a TOC to be generated and replaced according to
the modules purchased.

Suzanne

> This may not help your argument and you're probably
> already aware of it, but the AGPS Style manual opts for A:
> "It is conventional to number the preliminary pages of a
> book with lower-case roman numerals.  This practice allows
> extra material to be added before printing without having
> to change the page numbering of the main text.  For
> aesthetic reasons, the roman page numbers are not printed
> on some of the preliminary pages."
>  
> My gut reaction is to be scared of moving away from
> convention, but now that you've made me question it I
> can't see why we shouldn't do B instead.  Especially if
> you have control over what you are printing and are
> unlikely to insert extra front matter.
>  
> It could be a bold new move in publishing Bob - go where
> no man has gone before!
>  
> The only argument I could think of for A was that people
> expect to see it and your materials might be seen as less
> professional if they don't conform to convention?  As
> always, it depends on your audience.  If they don't read a
> lot of books they may not care one way or another.
> 
>   _____  
> 
> From: austechwriter-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:austechwriter-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> Bob Trussler Sent: Thursday, 23 November 2006 9:48 AM
> To: austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: atw: page numbering - which style to use
> 
> 
> There is a debate raging in my tech writer team about what
> numbering style we should use in our documents.  We are
> developing new standards.
>  
> We currently have two choices, shown below.  Does anyone
> have support for the modern way of using Arabic numbering
> throughout?  I reckon that Roman for front matter followed
> by Arabic for the content comes from the olden days of
> hand publishing when the content was assembled THEN the
> Table of Contents was assembled later, so why do we need
> to maintain this style? 
>  
> (A) Keep the front matter separate from main content:
> 
> - Front matter uses lower-case Roman  with the Title page
> and Copyright unnumbered
> 
> - Rest of the doc in sequential Arabic, starting at 1.
> 
> (B) Number the whole doc in sequential Arabic:
> 
> - Whole doc including the front matter in sequential
> Arabic.  Numbering begins at 1 on the title page
> 
> - Title page and Copyright with no number displayed.
> 
>  
> 
> Thanks in advance.
> 
> Bob Trussler
> 
>
**************************************************
To post a message to austechwriter, send the message to 
austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

To subscribe to austechwriter, send a message to 
austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with "subscribe" in the Subject field.

To unsubscribe, send a message to austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 
"unsubscribe" in the Subject field.

To search the austechwriter archives, go to 
www.freelists.org/archives/austechwriter

To contact the list administrator, send a message to 
austechwriter-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
**************************************************

Other related posts: