atw: Re: it's etc (was Re: US/Aus English)
- From: "Steve Hudson" <adslyy5g@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 22:16:08 +1000
Yet it is the basis of the rule you base it on.
-----Original Message-----
From: Clarke, Brian
Hi Peter,
The point I was trying to make is that the original reason for the emergence
of some usage or rule is not a necessary justification for continuing to
adhere to that usage or rule.
**************************************************
To post a message to austechwriter, send the message to
austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe to austechwriter, send a message to
austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with "subscribe" in the Subject field.
To unsubscribe, send a message to austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
"unsubscribe" in the Subject field.
To search the austechwriter archives, go to
www.freelists.org/archives/austechwriter
To contact the list administrator, send a message to
austechwriter-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
**************************************************
- References:
- atw: Re: it's etc (was Re: US/Aus English)
- From: Clarke, Brian
Other related posts:
- » atw: Re: it's etc (was Re: US/Aus English)
- » atw: Re: it's etc (was Re: US/Aus English)
- » atw: Re: it's etc (was Re: US/Aus English)
- atw: Re: it's etc (was Re: US/Aus English)
- From: Clarke, Brian