atw: Re: Writing numbers in text [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- From: Chris Virtue <cvlists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 22:48:37 +1100
No. The quoted piece sucks. Try reading it out loud.
I prefer to spell out one to ten and then use digits for 11-on.
Howard.Silcock@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Most usage guides have rules about when to write out numbers as words
(one, two, three, ...) and when to use numerals (1, 2, 3, ...).
However, from time to time I come across passages written like this
(from a document I've just been reading):
This solution has been designed to support up to five (5)
users, and three (3) of these systems are being procured.
I've seen this often enough to think there must be some rationale for
doing it this way, but I can't imagine what it is. It looks almost as
if the writer wonders whether readers mightn't understand the
'written-out' forms.
Anyone know the source of this style of writing? Is there a good
reason for it that I'm missing?
Howard
Howard Silcock
Technical Writer
Zare Pty Ltd
Ph 02 6261 2073
Fax 02 6112 2073
--
***************************************************
Chris Virtue
__O In House Technologies
\_\<, - a cyclist-friendly company
( )/( )
The revolution will not be motorised
- apologies to Gil Scott-Heron
***************************************************
In House Technolgies P/L does not warrant that any
attachments are free from viruses or other defects.
Detach at your own ri
**************************************************
To post a message to austechwriter, send the message to
austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe to austechwriter, send a message to austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
"subscribe" in the Subject field.
To unsubscribe, send a message to austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
"unsubscribe" in the Subject field.
To search the austechwriter archives, go to
www.freelists.org/archives/austechwriter
To contact the list administrator, send a message to
austechwriter-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
**************************************************
- References:
- atw: Writing numbers in text [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- From: Howard . Silcock
Other related posts:
- » atw: Re: Writing numbers in text [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Writing numbers in text [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Writing numbers in text [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Writing numbers in text [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Writing numbers in text [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Writing numbers in text [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Writing numbers in text [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Writing numbers in text [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Writing numbers in text [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Writing numbers in text [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Writing numbers in text [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Writing numbers in text [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Writing numbers in text [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Writing numbers in text [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Writing numbers in text [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Writing numbers in text [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Writing numbers in text [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
Most usage guides have rules about when to write out numbers as words (one, two, three, ...) and when to use numerals (1, 2, 3, ...). However, from time to time I come across passages written like this (from a document I've just been reading):
This solution has been designed to support up to five (5) users, and three (3) of these systems are being procured.
I've seen this often enough to think there must be some rationale for doing it this way, but I can't imagine what it is. It looks almost as if the writer wonders whether readers mightn't understand the 'written-out' forms.
Anyone know the source of this style of writing? Is there a good reason for it that I'm missing?
Howard Howard Silcock Technical Writer Zare Pty Ltd Ph 02 6261 2073Fax 02 6112 2073
- atw: Writing numbers in text [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- From: Howard . Silcock