atw: Re: Writing numbers in text [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- From: Janice Gelb <Janice.Gelb@xxxxxxx>
- To: austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 17:32:28 +1100
Howard.Silcock@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Most usage guides have rules about when to write out numbers as words
(one, two, three, ...) and when to use numerals (1, 2, 3, ...). However,
from time to time I come across passages written like this (from a
document I've just been reading):
This solution has been designed to support up to five (5) users,
and three (3) of these systems are being procured.
I've seen this often enough to think there must be some rationale for
doing it this way, but I can't imagine what it is. It looks almost as if
the writer wonders whether readers mightn't understand the 'written-out'
forms.
Anyone know the source of this style of writing? Is there a good reason
for it that I'm missing?
The fact that many style guides warn against doing
this very thing leads me to believe that obsessive
writers have a tendency to do this and we all have
to do our part in stamping it out :->
-- Janice
***********************************************************
Janice Gelb | The only connection Sun has with
janice.gelb@xxxxxxx | this message is the return address
**************************************************
To post a message to austechwriter, send the message to
austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe to austechwriter, send a message to austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
"subscribe" in the Subject field.
To unsubscribe, send a message to austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
"unsubscribe" in the Subject field.
To search the austechwriter archives, go to
www.freelists.org/archives/austechwriter
To contact the list administrator, send a message to
austechwriter-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
**************************************************
- Follow-Ups:
- atw: Re: Writing numbers in text [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- From: Howard . Silcock
- References:
- atw: Writing numbers in text [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- From: Howard . Silcock
Other related posts:
- » atw: Re: Writing numbers in text [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Writing numbers in text [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Writing numbers in text [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Writing numbers in text [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Writing numbers in text [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Writing numbers in text [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Writing numbers in text [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Writing numbers in text [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Writing numbers in text [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Writing numbers in text [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Writing numbers in text [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Writing numbers in text [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Writing numbers in text [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Writing numbers in text [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Writing numbers in text [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Writing numbers in text [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Writing numbers in text [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
Most usage guides have rules about when to write out numbers as words (one, two, three, ...) and when to use numerals (1, 2, 3, ...). However, from time to time I come across passages written like this (from a document I've just been reading):
This solution has been designed to support up to five (5) users, and three (3) of these systems are being procured.
I've seen this often enough to think there must be some rationale for doing it this way, but I can't imagine what it is. It looks almost as if the writer wonders whether readers mightn't understand the 'written-out' forms.
Anyone know the source of this style of writing? Is there a good reason for it that I'm missing?
- atw: Re: Writing numbers in text [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- From: Howard . Silcock
- atw: Writing numbers in text [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- From: Howard . Silcock