atw: Re: Who says that we are not perceived to be glorified secretaries?
- From: Michael Edward Granat <megranat@xxxxxxxx>
- To: austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 13:16:11 +1100
Arr, but then Stuart (Burn-you-to-the-bowline-field) they would surely have
added a requirement for the knowledge of C language.
You know C language, lad. "/ \, 1 - :" (Forward slash, back slash, then
one straight in the colon.)
'nough sabre rattlin' for one day.
Me parrot's getting wet and I prefer to have polyunsaturated.
(Was that not immediately a parrot to you?)
C++, therefore, includes added parry and thrust.
Methinks they need a proof reader instead, me buckos.
Cheers,
Michael Granat
Write Ideas
At 13:00 17/3/2004, you wrote:
>And I was a bit puzzled by "be savvy would be an advantage".
>Sounds like it would suit (or suite) someone with a pirate
>background: "Arr, Cap'n, I be savvy."
>---
>Stuart "Demonstrated aptitude for producing docs by reading the pirate
>code" Burnfield
>Information Developer
>Australian Programming Centre
Michael Granat -- Write Ideas*
Plain English Technical Communication.
Advertising Copywriting.
Business Writing.
E-mail: writeideas@xxxxxxxx
Web Site: <http://home.pacific.net.au/~megranat/>
*Trading As business #0828673K
Registered (1987) Corporate Affairs Victoria, Australia.
WITHOUT PREJUDICE
E & OE
**************************************************
To post a message to austechwriter, send the message to
austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe to austechwriter, send a message to
austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with "subscribe" in the Subject field.
To unsubscribe, send a message to austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
"unsubscribe" in the Subject field.
To search the austechwriter archives, go to
www.freelists.org/archives/austechwriter
To contact the list administrator, send a message to
austechwriter-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
**************************************************
- References:
- atw: Re: Who says that we are not perceived to be glorifiedsecretaries?
- From: Stuart Burnfield
Other related posts:
- » atw: Re: Who says that we are not perceived to be glorified secretaries?
- » atw: Re: Who says that we are not perceived to be glorified secretaries?
- » atw: Re: Who says that we are not perceived to be glorified secretaries?
- » atw: Re: Who says that we are not perceived to be glorified secretaries?
- » atw: Re: Who says that we are not perceived to be glorified secretaries?
- » atw: Re: Who says that we are not perceived to be glorified secretaries?
- » atw: Re: Who says that we are not perceived to be glorified secretaries?
- » atw: Re: Who says that we are not perceived to be glorified secretaries?
- atw: Re: Who says that we are not perceived to be glorifiedsecretaries?
- From: Stuart Burnfield