atw: Re: Usage survey: the expression "consists of"
- From: Nick Shears <nshears@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 20:32:33 -0700
I agree. I think of "consists of" as expressing exclusivity.
Cheers
Nick
From: austechwriter-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:austechwriter-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Kath Bowman
Sent: Friday, 16 March 2012 1:29 PM
To: austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: atw: Re: Usage survey: the expression "consists of"
I agree with Michael. It implies that this represents the entire therapy.
Cheers
Kath
From: austechwriter-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:austechwriter-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Geoffrey
Sent: Friday, 16 March 2012 1:47 PM
To: austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: atw: Usage survey: the expression "consists of"
Hi austechies
Can I get your feedback on how you interpret the expression "consists of" or
"consisted of". In the following example:
"Drug therapy consisted of 0.25 mg of digoxin per day and 40 mg of propranolol
twice a day."
do you read that as saying that the entire therapy included just digoxin and
propranolol and nothing else? Or do you read it as saying that the therapy
included digoxin and propranolol and possibly something else?
Don't worry about what might or might not be correct (whatever that means). The
issue is how you interpret "consisted of": as giving the full set of items or a
sub-set of items.
Cheers
Geoffrey Marnell
Principal Consultant
Abelard Consulting Pty Ltd
P: 03 9596 3456
M: 0419 574 668
F: 03 9596 3625
W: www.abelard.com.au<http://www.abelard.com.au/>
Other related posts:
