atw: Re: Statistics to demonstrate value ...
- From: Janice Gelb <Janice.Gelb@xxxxxxx>
- To: austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 15:07:48 +1100
On 19/10/09 02:57 PM, Peter Martin wrote:
Just another thought or two -- along these lines (But beware! this may be a two-edged sword if your templates don't comply with recommendations) From time to time it is convenient to point out that badly-formatted documents bugger customer comprehension.
[snip]
Meanwhile, (or in addition), often Support people can provide assistance here if they can point to instances where sloppy docs gave them more grief than they needed, which ruins the company's product image, wastes support time, and pisses customers off. (One reason why I'm a great believer in tech writers doing what they can to co-ordinate with Support people, have them reviewing docs, and listening to what help desk people say about what customers just get wrong or simply don't read in the docs.)
All good points. However, they relate to product docs and external customers. Because the original post specifically noted that these were in-house documents, I didn't include these angles. -- Janice *********************************************************** Janice Gelb | The only connection Sun has with janice.gelb@xxxxxxx | this message is the return address ************************************************** To view the austechwriter archives, go to www.freelists.org/archives/austechwriter To unsubscribe, send a message to austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with "unsubscribe" in the Subject field (without quotes). To manage your subscription (e.g., set and unset DIGEST and VACATION modes) go to www.freelists.org/list/austechwriter To contact the list administrator, send a message to austechwriter-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx **************************************************
- Follow-Ups:
- atw: Re: Statistics to demonstrate value ...
- From: Peter Martin
- atw: Re: Statistics to demonstrate value ...
- From: Peter Martin
- atw: Re: Statistics to demonstrate value ...
- References:
- atw: Re: Statistics to demonstrate value ...
- From: Peter Martin
- atw: Re: Statistics to demonstrate value ...
Other related posts:
- » atw: Re: Statistics to demonstrate value ... - Peter Martin
- » atw: Re: Statistics to demonstrate value ... - Lewington, Warren J (WT)
- » atw: Re: Statistics to demonstrate value ... - Christine Kent
- » atw: Re: Statistics to demonstrate value ... - Janice Gelb
- » atw: Re: Statistics to demonstrate value ... - Suzy
- » atw: Re: Statistics to demonstrate value ... - Suzy
- » atw: Re: Statistics to demonstrate value .. - Suzy
- » atw: Re: Statistics to demonstrate value ... - Peter Martin
- » atw: Re: Statistics to demonstrate value ... - Janice Gelb
- » atw: Re: Statistics to demonstrate value ... - Peter Martin
- » atw: Re: Statistics to demonstrate value ... - Christine Kent
- » atw: Re: Statistics to demonstrate value ... - Janice Gelb
- » atw: Re: Statistics to demonstrate value ... - Peter Martin
- » atw: Re: Statistics to demonstrate value ... - Suzy
- » atw: Re: Statistics to demonstrate value ... - Caz.H
- » atw: Re: Statistics to demonstrate value ... - Suzy
- » atw: Re: Statistics to demonstrate value ... - Peter Martin
- » atw: Re: Statistics to demonstrate value ... - Ana Young
- » atw: Re: Statistics to demonstrate value ... - Caz.H
- » atw: Re: Statistics to demonstrate value ... - Caz.H
- » atw: Re: Statistics to demonstrate value ... - Peter Martin
- » atw: Re: Statistics to demonstrate value ... - Caz.H