atw: Re: Should we give the users what they want? (oops)
- From: Peter Martin <peterm_5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 19:56:29 +1100
Peter Martin:
You wrote:
> Christine:
> You wrote:
>
>> I have absolutely no doubt that we are going through a paradigm shift.
>>
> Yes, just as we did when radio and then TV came, and all those who would only
> have
> paper and books
> said we'll all be rooned, while others said newspapers will continue to rule
> the day,
> and all that. Despite L'Academie Francais (plus accents) and Canute,
> language and
> media interests and mixes of each
> change, and even "un jean" (a pair of jeans) is now built into new
> dictionaries.
>
>
>> I have been
>> doing my darnedest to stay in tune with what it is by getting on to Facebook
>> (the
>> value of which is now apparent to me) and Twitter (the value of which still
>> eludes
>> me) and doing lots of other Web 2.0 things. I am not doing this to be
>> fashionable,
>> or to pretend to be young, but to stay employable and useful into my old age.
>>
>>
>> I think it is like a major, tectonic plate shifting, earthquake - we have no
>> idea
>> what the final new configuration will look like till things stop shifting -
>> all we
>> can do for now is keep our balance, and avoid wasting our energy trying to
>> stop the
>> earthquake.
>>
> [snip]
>
>> So the only positive thing I can do is keep myself flexible so that I can
>> adapt
>> readily to change and not be overwhelmed by it. This means I also avoid
>> wasting time
>> trying to shore up the "ancien regime" when it is already dead as a dodo.
>> Any
>> grammatical or linguistic rules I apply, I apply because it suits me or my
>> readership, not because it is "right". Right is currently a very rapidly
>> moving
>> target indeed.
>>
>>
> Sounds sensible to me. Not much point in relying on any single media format
> as a way
> of maintaining would-be "effective" communication if it turns out no one is
> reading
> much of it anyway.. The only problem is going to be getting the balance
> right.
> And I personally doubt that relying on say, Wikis to do the while trick is as
> silly as
> relying solely on paper, and saying all other things are meaningless and
> barbaric.
>
>> That being said, to my perceptions, a lot of what is happening currently IS
>> asinine,
>> but I will allow the possibility that I am the one whose thinking is out of
>> tune with
>> the changes. However, I don't think this IS an age thing. It's a Zeitgeist
>> thing -
>> its just incidental that one person is young and another is old - at these
>> times.
>>
>>
> Hurrah! See? We can agree !
Well, we could, perhaps, if it could just replace "doubt" above with "think".
-Peter M
peterm_5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
**************************************************
To view the austechwriter archives, go to
www.freelists.org/archives/austechwriter
To unsubscribe, send a message to austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
"unsubscribe" in the Subject field (without quotes).
To manage your subscription (e.g., set and unset DIGEST and VACATION modes) go
to www.freelists.org/list/austechwriter
To contact the list administrator, send a message to
austechwriter-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
**************************************************
Other related posts:
- » atw: Re: Should we give the users what they want? (oops) - Peter Martin