atw: Re: SEQ fields for sub-steps?
- From: Melanie Kendell <melanie.kendell@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 11:34:45 +1000
>
> (BTW I found in the help that the switch is \*alphabetic.)
>
You are, of course, correct I'm using Word 2003 which has a much nicer user
interface for this stuff and let's me be lazy in remembering the exact
syntax.
Also, I've been playing in Unix lately which is a bit like driving a car
with the indicators/windscreen wipers on the opposite side to your own as
far as which way the slashes go :)
-Melanie
- References:
- atw: Re: SEQ fields for sub-steps?
- From: Sonja McShane
Other related posts:
- » atw: Re: SEQ fields for sub-steps?
- » atw: Re: SEQ fields for sub-steps?
- » atw: Re: SEQ fields for sub-steps?
- » atw: Re: SEQ fields for sub-steps?
- » atw: Re: SEQ fields for sub-steps?
- atw: Re: SEQ fields for sub-steps?
- From: Sonja McShane