atw: Re: SEQ fields for sub-steps?

From: "Sonja McShane" <smcshane@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 10:58:36 +1000

Great stuff Malanie. Thanks!
Sonja
 
(BTW I found in the help that the switch is \*alphabetic.)
 
___________________
Sonja McShane
Editor
Panviva Pty Ltd
bh: (03) 9822 0555
mb:  0413 769 548
-----Original Message-----
From: austechwriter-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:austechwriter-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Melanie Kendell
Sent: Tuesday, 16 August 2005 10:47 AM
To: austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: atw: Re: SEQ fields for sub-steps?


Hi Sonja
 

        To answer my own question, I've got to use LISTNUM fields
instead, don't I. Do I?

 
No - use another sequence, ie SEQ with another identifier (eg SEQ
substep), and a switch, /alphabetic, to get it to be lowercase letters.
 
-Melanie

Follow-Ups:

atw: Re: SEQ fields for sub-steps?
From: Melanie Kendell

atw: Re: SEQ fields for sub-steps?

Other related posts: