atw: Re: SEC: UNCLASSIFIED Gerunds rule OK (WAS Re:
- From: bob.trussler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- To: austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 12:32:29 +1100
as in "we just got Jeffed"
or am I starting to Granatise !!!
Love it
___________
Bob Trussler
Hi MG,
The issue was on the use of, existence of, Gerunds.
If you looked up in your dictionary the word "FATHER" it would appear as a
NOUN. It is in fact representing someone FATHERING, TO FATHER, and as such
FATHER objectifies a process. This dynamic of verb->noun is
nominalisation and is a property of language in general, more so a
property of your brain structure/dynamic in general where precision
favours nominalisation.
It is this objectification, and so universalisation, that can upset things
in that a person can be fathering, loving, parenting, policing etc etc but
the objectification removes all of these 'doings' to make 'beings'. As
such one does not consider one's Father as anything other than 'father' -
where in some contexts it could be useful to 'denominalise' for the sake
of communication issues etc. (IOW it could be easier to shift focus to
talking to 'Chris' rather than to 'Dad' in certain contexts)
I can denominalise (?) and talk of the verb 'to Granet' which could
represent, for example, your style of prose or expression (to Granetise?)
- or 'to Lofting' which would cover giving someone a real hard time which
they did not expect/anticipate! ;-)
Chris.
******
**********************************************************************
Disclaimer: This e-mail is intended for the use of the addressee and may
contain information that is confidential, commercially valuable or subject to
legal or parliamentary privilege. If you are not the intended recipient you
are notified that any review, re-transmission, disclosure, use or dissemination
of this communication is strictly prohibited by several Commonwealth Acts of
Parliament. If you have received this communication in error please notify the
sender immediately and delete all copies of this transmission together with any
attachments.
**********************************************************************
**************************************************
To post a message to austechwriter, send the message to
austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe to austechwriter, send a message to
austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with "subscribe" in the Subject field.
To unsubscribe, send a message to austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
"unsubscribe" in the Subject field.
To search the austechwriter archives, go to
www.freelists.org/archives/austechwriter
To contact the list administrator, send a message to
austechwriter-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
**************************************************
- References:
- atw: Re: SEC: UNCLASSIFIED Gerunds rule OK (WAS Re:
- From: lofting
Other related posts:
- » atw: Re: SEC: UNCLASSIFIED Gerunds rule OK (WAS Re:
- » atw: Re: SEC: UNCLASSIFIED Gerunds rule OK (WAS Re:
- atw: Re: SEC: UNCLASSIFIED Gerunds rule OK (WAS Re:
- From: lofting