atw: Re: SEC: UNCLASS RE: Pet hates

On the use of "eg" "ie" and "etc" etc, please don't forget that these
matters and many more pet hates are already dealt with by the Style
Manual (formerly, the AGPS Style Manual). This worthy tome should ever
be your first point of reference for usage issues in Australian-English
writing.

Howard's table of editor preferences is great: as I said, every office
should have one, but there is no point in wracking your brains for
arguments to suppport your preferred conventions when the hard work has
already been done for you by the editors of the Style Manual. (Same goes
for dictionaries: big Macq, Australian Oxford)

My approach to in-house style manuals is first of all to point out to
the user group that the Style Manual *exists* and is the authority for
government and professional writing in Australia; second to bring their
attention to elements of style that directly affect their work and that
they also concur with the Style Manual; third to set out in-house
conventions that may vary with the Style Manual.=20
Then I give 'em a template.

-----Original Message-----
From: austechwriter-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:austechwriter-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Silcock, Howard
DR
Sent: Tuesday, 24 May 2005 12:45 PM
To: Austechwriter (austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)
Subject: atw: SEC: UNCLASS RE: Pet hates

Thank you to all who've responded so far to my call for 'pet hates'.
This
isn't intended to stem the flow, but more to acknowledge contributions
and
to address issues that have arisen. Keep 'em coming ...

The latest response, about i.e. and e.g., has got me thinking. As people
have said, 'that is' and 'for example' serve the same purpose, but I've
been
in the habit of using e.g., particularly in 'asides', usually in
brackets
(e.g., this one). But now I'm wondering whether we shouldn't abandon
them -
and especially their more obscure cousins like 'viz.' and 'sc.' I
imagine
when they were used initially most writers would have studied Latin ,
but
now, as Allan says, people often don't even remember which is which.
(Reminds of a time when I was an academic and my co-author, in a paper
we
wrote, used the phrase 'inter alia' and caused me great puzzlement,
until it
dawned on me that he must have confused it with 'mutatis mutandis'. He
didn't want to follow my advice and use English instead, though!) The
fact
that they may be quicker for the author shouldn't be a consideration -
you
could always use AutoCorrect to replace the short forms with the long
ones
if that's really a concern. So, yes, I think I will add these to the
list
and stop using them myself.=20

As for 'via' - well, I think that's OK in its geographical meaning
(London
to Sydney via Los Angeles), but I dislike when people use it as a fancy
substitute for an ordinary word like 'through'.

I'm reluctant to include 'and/or', especially having been caught out
using
it myself, though I agree that its use should be severely limited. I
imagine
in technical contexts it could supply needed precision occasionally,
though.
Maybe I should just say that in an appropriate entry.

The 'steep learning curve' is also something I never really thought
about.
I'd naturally think of the learning curve as plotting amount learnt
against
time, in which case, as Brian C said, it's really a shallow curve in
cases
where you need a lot of time to master the basics. Or is there some
other
way to visualise a 'learning curve'? Oh yes, I just did some research on
the
Web - in psychology researchers apparently plot time taken to master
each
step of a series measured over time against the elapsed time. The
learning
curve would then *descend* steeply if the initial steps are hard but
subsequent ones quickly become easier.

Now to Mr Granat.=20

Thank you for reporting that the page looks OK in Opera 8. The last
version
of Opera that I tried didn't handle JavaScript too well, but I don't
remember the version number. I should try Opera 8.=20

Oh, and the moving ant on my home page? Just a bit of fun really - do
you
remember that thing called fun? But it also served as an exercise in
using
JavaScript for animation. He does turn around (I think it's a 'he') when
he
finally reaches the edge of the page - if you wait long enough - but
seems
unable to head back to the right again. The Adults Only link (mention of
that should encourage people to visit!) is also an exercise to test my
JavaScript, based on an email joke.

Yes, I did check out Bill Bryson's Dictionary of Difficult Words - in
fact,
I think it may have been after you mentioned it some time ago. A nice
book -
but I only borrowed it from the library, so can't use it from day to
day.

Thanks again to all respondents

Howard

-------------------------------
=20    Howard L. Silcock
=20     Technical Writer
Project Office - Infrastructure
=20   Department of Defence
=20      (02) 626 58828 =20
-------------------------------



**************************************************
To post a message to austechwriter, send the message to
austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

To subscribe to austechwriter, send a message to
austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with "subscribe" in the Subject
field.

To unsubscribe, send a message to austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
with "unsubscribe" in the Subject field.

To search the austechwriter archives, go to
www.freelists.org/archives/austechwriter

To contact the list administrator, send a message to
austechwriter-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
**************************************************
IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachment to it are intended only =
to be read or used by the named addressee. It is confidential and may con=
tain legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is w=
aived or lost by any mistaken transmission to you. The RTA is not respons=
ible for any unauthorised alterations to this e-mail or attachment to it.=
=20Views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, an=
d are not necessarily the views of the RTA. If you receive this e-mail in=
=20error, please immediately delete it from your system and notify the se=
nder. You must not disclose, copy or use any part of this e-mail if you a=
re not the intended recipient.
**************************************************
To post a message to austechwriter, send the message to 
austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

To subscribe to austechwriter, send a message to 
austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with "subscribe" in the Subject field.

To unsubscribe, send a message to austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 
"unsubscribe" in the Subject field.

To search the austechwriter archives, go to 
www.freelists.org/archives/austechwriter

To contact the list administrator, send a message to 
austechwriter-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
**************************************************

Other related posts: