atw: Re: SEC: UNCLASS Pet hates
- From: MHT <runfox@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 19:57:33 -0500
This one is neither technical, nor written, and is at its irritating best
if delivered in a sticky sweet, bubbly squeal. My pet peeve would be the
words "go" and "goes? as a replacement for "said", usually accompanied
by an excessive amount of ?like? (having nothing to do with affection).
?So, like, I go...? ??and then like, he goes??
In my neck of the woods, the younger crew use ?go/goes? with such
regularity (in what passes for speech) that I'm not certain that they even
realize that the word ?said? is a part of the language.
Ranks right up there with finger nails on the black board.
MNMary
At 07:27 PM 5/22/2005, you wrote:
>Recently a few contributors have paraded some of their 'pet hates' (words
>and phrases we can't stand seeing) - think of Naomi railing about 'detrain'
>and Bede coming down hard on 'impact' and the responses they provoked. It
>occurs to me that many of us probably carry around a similar store and I'd
>be interested to hear a few more from anyone who'd like to share some more.
>(I'm particularly interested in those we'd be likely to correct regularly in
>our work as tech writers.) Some colleagues at work and I recently started
>collecting some of these and I've now put them on a web page
>(http://members.iinet.net.au/~howard.silcock/checklist.html)
>under the heading A Technical Editor's Blacklist. It's intended to be a
>dynamic collection so if I share your hates and you're happy to see them
>published I may add them to the list. I'm now thinking about creating
>entries for 'impact' and 'affect/effect' - though 'detrain' is probably out
>of scope, as it's hardly technical editing material (but I do agree with you
>nevertheless, Naomi).
>
>Howard
>
>-------------------------------
> Howard L. Silcock
> Technical Writer
>Project Office - Infrastructure
> Department of Defence
> (02) 626 58828
>-------------------------------
>
>
>**************************************************
>To post a message to austechwriter, send the message to
>austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>To subscribe to austechwriter, send a message to
>austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with "subscribe" in the Subject field.
>
>To unsubscribe, send a message to austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
>"unsubscribe" in the Subject field.
>
>To search the austechwriter archives, go to
>www.freelists.org/archives/austechwriter
>
>To contact the list administrator, send a message to
>austechwriter-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>**************************************************
**************************************************
To post a message to austechwriter, send the message to
austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe to austechwriter, send a message to
austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with "subscribe" in the Subject field.
To unsubscribe, send a message to austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
"unsubscribe" in the Subject field.
To search the austechwriter archives, go to
www.freelists.org/archives/austechwriter
To contact the list administrator, send a message to
austechwriter-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
**************************************************
- References:
- atw: SEC: UNCLASS Pet hates
- From: Silcock, Howard DR
Other related posts:
- » atw: Re: SEC: UNCLASS Pet hates
- » atw: Re: SEC: UNCLASS Pet hates
- » atw: Re: SEC: UNCLASS Pet hates
- » atw: Re: SEC: UNCLASS Pet hates
- » atw: Re: SEC: UNCLASS Pet hates
- » atw: Re: SEC: UNCLASS Pet hates
- » atw: Re: SEC: UNCLASS Pet hates
- atw: SEC: UNCLASS Pet hates
- From: Silcock, Howard DR