atw: Re: SEC: UNCLASS Frameworks
- From: "Michael Lewis" <mlewis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, <austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 14:33:02 +1000
Howard Silcock:
> For me, one word that provokes this reaction is 'framework'.
I don't necessarily have a problem with the word; indeed, I use it in my
teaching
of academic writing, when I tell students that they need to identify
the "conceptual framework" for the problem they are working on. A conceptual
framework includes underlying theories, related studies, and the implications
of
their own and others' ideas. Foundations, walls, and roof, as it were. But I
confess that I do have to explain the term when I introduce it. Trouble is, I
haven't been able to come up with an equally concise alternative. (It's only
concise when I use it the next time, of course!)
> Is there a word for words like this, that suggest action and achievement
> but actually promise almost nothing?
Verbosity? Empty rhetoric? Wind? Pollie-speak? A tale told by an idiot (as in
Macbeth: "All sound and fury, signifying nothing")?
- Michael Lewis
**************************************************
To post a message to austechwriter, send the message to
austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe to austechwriter, send a message to
austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with "subscribe" in the Subject field.
To unsubscribe, send a message to austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
"unsubscribe" in the Subject field.
To search the austechwriter archives, go to
www.freelists.org/archives/austechwriter
To contact the list administrator, send a message to
austechwriter-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
**************************************************
Other related posts: