atw: Re: RTF vs. Word Formats: what do you lose Word -> RTF
- From: "Steve Hudson" <adslyy5g@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 09:52:04 +1000
Indeed, there is RTF 1.0 and RTF 2.0. RTF 2.0 uses extended definitions to
allow holding more Word specific info.
**************************************************
To post a message to austechwriter, send the message to
austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe to austechwriter, send a message to
austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with "subscribe" in the Subject field.
To unsubscribe, send a message to austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
"unsubscribe" in the Subject field.
To search the austechwriter archives, go to
www.freelists.org/archives/austechwriter
To contact the list administrator, send a message to
austechwriter-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
**************************************************
- References:
- atw: Re: RTF vs. Word Formats: what do you lose Word -> RTF
- From: Peter Bloxsom
Other related posts:
- » atw: Re: RTF vs. Word Formats: what do you lose Word -> RTF
- » atw: Re: RTF vs. Word Formats: what do you lose Word -> RTF
- » atw: Re: RTF vs. Word Formats: what do you lose Word -> RTF
- atw: Re: RTF vs. Word Formats: what do you lose Word -> RTF
- From: Peter Bloxsom