atw: Re: Quick grammar question [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- From: SUNTER Bede <Bede_SUNTER@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 17:49:30 +1100
Damn you Howard-you've made me refer to the style manual.
This is not so much a problem of hyphenation as one of linkage: you need
to show the reader that there is more to the phrase than the first word
indicates.
The style manual, using the examples 'non-English speaking countries'
and 'anti-harm minimisation stance' recommends using an en-rule when
linking one word with more than one other-not a hyphen. In the example
'district-specific' the hyphen shows that the words form a compound
adjective: the hyphen in this case is used to avoid possible confusion.
With 'non' preceding, the chance of confusion is reduced and the en-dash
flags to the reader that a multi-word term follows.
*Conclusion:*
district-specific
non-district specific
This also deals with the problem of 'non-Department of Defence staff'.
The further problem of whether 'non' is set solid or hyphenated is best
dealt with by consulting the dictionary. In a number of words, 'non' is
set solid (nonconforming, nonentity, nonlinear, nonlethal) in others
it's hyphenated (non-gaseous, non-fat). The big Macq provides an
exhaustive list that mostly serves to indicate that there is no rule!
For example: 'non-smoker' and yet 'nondrinker'.
'Non' becomes set solid with stem words, I assume, as the sense of
"nonness" becomes conventional in the language-people say they belong to
nonconforming churches but not to conforming churches-one assumes
because their conformingness is unremarkable. Similarly, more people
drink than nondrink and more people non-smoke than smoke.
Hyphens are used throughout in multi-word compounds like "I'm a
go-with-the-flow kind of guy".
Well, that's enough orthography for one day I guess. I hope it sheds
some light.
Bede
________________________________
From: austechwriter-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:austechwriter-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Silcock, Howard
DR
Sent: Tuesday, 20 December 2005 16:53 PM
To: austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: atw: Re: Quick grammar question [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
I thought this was all agreed. But now that an element of dissent has
appeared, I must jump in and support those preferring
'non-district-specific' to 'non-district specific'. The latter looks
ridiculous to me - it's natural to read the hyphen as linking only the
words it's directly attached to, so it looks as if it means 'specific to
non-districts'. And using 'non-district specific' alongside
'district-specific' would be even more ridiculous - if you put a hyphen
between 'district' and 'specific' in one you should certainly be
consistent and do so in the other.
More generally, I'd say there's a problem with attaching prefixes like
'non-' to multi-word phrases that don't already have hyphens. For
instance, if you refer to 'Department of Defence personnel', then it
might seem you could also reasonably refer to 'non-Department of Defence
personnel'. But to me that looks as ridiculous as 'non-district
specific' and for the same reason: it looks as if you're talking about
personnel from a non-Department dedicated to Defence matters, or maybe
just Defence personnel from a non-Department (whatever that is). In
cases like this, I think the only solution is to rephrase the whole
thing.
Some people put 'non' in without any hyphen at all, but to me that looks
even worse, because 'non' isn't a word in its own right any more than
'pre' or 'anti' are.
And what about 'global'? That would be the best solution, I agree, as
long as it makes sense in the context.
Maybe we should all just forget about this and look forward to our
holidays...
Howard
-----Original Message-----
From: austechwriter-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:austechwriter-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jill Nicholson
Sent: Tuesday, 20 December 2005 14:17
To: austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: atw: Re: Quick grammar question
No, only 2, it is non-district specific.
In haste
Happy Holidays/Xmas/Whatever Jill Nicholson
N&H Communications
2 Park Ave
ROSEVILLE, NSW 2069
61+2+94174302
jpnicho@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
www.nhcommunications.com.au everyone
Jill
----- Original Message -----
From: Sonja McShane <mailto:smcshane@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2005 8:58 AM
Subject: atw: Quick grammar question
A quick question for the grammarish types. When there
are two categories of information, district-specific and
non-district-specific, do I put the two hyphens in the second one? I'm
pretty sure I do, but not 100%. (It's one of those
very-slow-to-get-the-brain-in-gear mornings!)
Thanks,
Sonja
___________________
Sonja McShane
Panviva Pty Ltd
bh: (03) 9822 0555
mb: 0413 769 548
IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachment to it are intended only to be
read or used by the named addressee. It is confidential and may contain legally
privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by
any mistaken transmission to you. The RTA is not responsible for any
unauthorised alterations to this e-mail or attachment to it. Views expressed in
this message are those of the individual sender, and are not necessarily the
views of the RTA. If you receive this e-mail in error, please immediately
delete it from your system and notify the sender. You must not disclose, copy
or use any part of this e-mail if you are not the intended recipient.
Other related posts: