atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! (on behalf of Petra) [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- From: Howard.Silcock@xxxxxxxxxxx
- To: austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 10:54:30 +1100
[ Petra asked me to send this on her behalf (just when I was wondering how
we could forcibly shut the thread down!) ]
Hi All,
I tried to post 3 times yesterday but couldn't get through. Most
frustrating. Will try again.
I would never quote google returns to prove any usage is right or wrong. I
quoted it only because it was suggested that the Australian ratio of use
of mice/mouses is different to elsewhere when google returns would suggest
otherwise. I like to see whether incorrect usage ever wins over correct
usage and so far I've never found it. For example, a very large percentage
of people I know insist on saying "between you and I" even when I explain
why it’s "between you and me" – the correct versions wins by far in google
returns. Like Terry, I notice a lot of "was laying on the bed" instead of
"was lying on the bed." However, when I google I find 52,000 returns for
"was lying on the bed" and only 14,000 returns for "was laying on the
bed". If anyone ever finds an incorrect usage producing more returns in
google than correct usage I'd be fascinated to know about it.
What I would almost always use is the DICTIONARY as an AUTHORITY and the
dictionary quotes from Howard in a much earlier post seem to have been
lost. I quote them again below.
When a dictionary gives one word first and then another after the word
"also" the inference is that the first word is the more commonly used term
and the word after "also" is less often used (supported in the case of
mice/mouses by the google return result), although there could be a 50/50
situation too I guess.
Thus, should the need ever arise, I will feel perfectly confident in using
my preferred term, mice; those who prefer mouses will also be sanctioned
by the dictionary.
I asked one of my flatmates whether she would use computer mouses or
computer mice – she said, "I'd say computer meeces" – I just googled and
guess what? There are 4 returns!
Regards,
Petra
- Follow-Ups:
- atw: Addendum to: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! (on behalf of Petra) [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- From: Howard . Silcock
- References:
- atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- From: Rebecca Caldwell
Other related posts:
- » atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! (on behalf of Petra) [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- atw: Addendum to: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! (on behalf of Petra) [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- From: Howard . Silcock
- atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- From: Rebecca Caldwell