atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

bja wrote:


Regarding your comment "Hadn't realized until now that those publications
were serving the vast unwashed masses", I can only say that of course they
are. That's why they exist in the first place.



As opposed to the elite chosen few like yourself?

I still maintain that claiming the One True Way on
terminology like this is a mistake. Had you said it
was your personal preference with sufficient sources
to back it up in the first place, a lot of this endless
discussion would probably never have taken place.

-- Janice

***********************************************************
Janice Gelb          | The only connection Sun has with
janice.gelb@xxxxxxx  | this message is the return address
**************************************************
To post a message to austechwriter, send the message to 
austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

To subscribe to austechwriter, send a message to austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 
"subscribe" in the Subject field.

To unsubscribe, send a message to austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 
"unsubscribe" in the Subject field.

To search the austechwriter archives, go to 
www.freelists.org/archives/austechwriter

To contact the list administrator, send a message to 
austechwriter-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
**************************************************

Other related posts: