atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- From: rhardman <zut@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 12:53:09 +0100
* À 20080219-2220_Tue, Brian A Clarke (brianclarke01@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) écrivit:
> Oh dear,
>
> A 'which vs that' and 'group=plural' non-specialist.
> Respected by whom? Other autocrats?
Respected, to a lesser or greater degree, by a majority of
French speakers. Broadly speaking, there is more interest in
the language and how it is used in France, than I have
noticed in
English-speaking countries. There is a notion of "elegance"
of speech and writing (and cooking and clothing...), which
includes being "correct".
When thinking of the Academie, I always think of the 40
members, not the building. Sorry if I confused you.
Yes, you are right:
"...Academie Française that makes decisions..."
but
"...money-making concern, which teaches French.."
I concede you the comma, no more (-:
Reg
**************************************************
To post a message to austechwriter, send the message to
austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe to austechwriter, send a message to
austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with "subscribe" in the Subject field.
To unsubscribe, send a message to austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
"unsubscribe" in the Subject field.
To search the austechwriter archives, go to
www.freelists.org/archives/austechwriter
To contact the list administrator, send a message to
austechwriter-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
**************************************************
- References:
- atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- From: bja
- atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- From: Ken Randall
- atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- From: rhardman
- atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- From: Brian A Clarke
Other related posts:
- » atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- From: bja
- atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- From: Ken Randall
- atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- From: rhardman
- atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- From: Brian A Clarke