atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- From: "Brian A Clarke" <brianclarke01@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 22:20:10 +1100
Oh dear,
A 'which vs that' and 'group=plural' non-specialist.
Respected by whom? Other autocrats?
Brian.
----- Original Message -----
From: "rhardman" <zut@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2008 9:47 PM
Subject: atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
<sneep>
> Actually, it is L'Academie Française which makes decisions
> about spelling and grammar here. Their decisions are not
> always popular, or popularly accepted. But at least the
> problem will have been reviewed by some highly respected
> practitioners of the language.
>
> L'Alliance Française is a money-making concern which teaches
> French to foreigners.
**************************************************
To post a message to austechwriter, send the message to
austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe to austechwriter, send a message to
austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with "subscribe" in the Subject field.
To unsubscribe, send a message to austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
"unsubscribe" in the Subject field.
To search the austechwriter archives, go to
www.freelists.org/archives/austechwriter
To contact the list administrator, send a message to
austechwriter-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
**************************************************
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- From: bja
- atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- From: Ken Randall
- atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- From: rhardman
Other related posts:
- » atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- From: bja
- atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- From: Ken Randall
- atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- From: rhardman