atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- From: rhardman <zut@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 11:47:30 +0100
* À 20080219-2031_Tue, Ken Randall (kenneth_james_randall@xxxxxxxxxxxx) écrivit:
> This whole situation could be obviated were there the
> equivalent organisation to the Alliance Francaise. It polices
> the French language to maintain its integrity. There is the
Actually, it is L'Academie Française which makes decisions
about spelling and grammar here. Their decisions are not
always popular, or popularly accepted. But at least the
problem will have been reviewed by some highly respected
practitioners of the language.
L'Alliance Française is a money-making concern which teaches
French to foreigners.
The mouse issue does not exist, here. Une souris, deux
souris, alors c'est quoi ton problème ?
Reg Hardman
**************************************************
To post a message to austechwriter, send the message to
austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe to austechwriter, send a message to
austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with "subscribe" in the Subject field.
To unsubscribe, send a message to austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
"unsubscribe" in the Subject field.
To search the austechwriter archives, go to
www.freelists.org/archives/austechwriter
To contact the list administrator, send a message to
austechwriter-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
**************************************************
- Follow-Ups:
- atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- From: Brian A Clarke
- References:
- atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- From: bja
- atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- From: Ken Randall
Other related posts:
- » atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- » atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- From: Brian A Clarke
- atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- From: bja
- atw: Re: Oh no, not 'mouses' again! [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
- From: Ken Randall