atw: Re: O.T. "Reliance on Microsoft a threat to security: experts"

Clever, insightful response Steve. No doubt intended to enhance your
prestige amongst your peers, future employers and customers.

Well done.

You've shown that you can send an email without proofing it and can be
abusive towards a peer.

I'm impressed.

Regards,

Bruce Ashley



> -----Original Message-----
> From: austechwriter-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:austechwriter-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Steve Hudson
> Sent: Saturday, 27 September 2003 2:59 AM
> To: austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: atw: Re: O.T. "Reliance on Microsoft a threat to security:
> experts"
>
>
> And so in response, we have yet another writer commenting on
> the content of
> another writer's content, without any without any intelligent
> independent
> analysis being performed by either of the latter writers.
>
> Fucking moron
>
> Steve Hudson
>
> Word Heretic, Sydney, Australia
> Tricky stuff with Word or words for you.
> Email:      steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Products:   http://www.geocities.com/word_heretic/products.html
> Spellbooks: 728 pages of dump left and dropping...
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: austechwriter-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:austechwriter-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Brian Clarke
> Sent: Friday, 26 September 2003 3:08 PM
> To: austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: atw: Re: O.T. "Reliance on Microsoft a threat to security:
> experts"
>
>
> Craig,
> Any monopoly has nasty economic effects on its consumer market.
>
> My comment was about the fact that we had one writer commenting on how
> wonderful another writer's comment on other etc .. without
> any intelligent
> independent analysis being performed by either of the latter writers.
>
> Brian.
>
>   To me, the article (at
>
> http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2003/09/25/1064083097573.html)
> seemed very
>   sensible.
>   <snip>
>   I believe that Microsoft software often _is_ wasteful, but
> I doubt the
>   reasons and figures stated by the article.
>
>   Brian (Clarke) wrote about the article:
>   BC> What a load of old cobblers!
>
>   Brian, isn't it true that _any_ technology monopoly tends to cause
> security
>   breaches to have a wider and therefore more catastrophic effect?
>
>   Regards,
>   Craig

**************************************************
To post a message to austechwriter, send the message to 
austechwriter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

To subscribe to austechwriter, send a message to 
austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with "subscribe" in the Subject field.

To unsubscribe, send a message to austechwriter-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 
"unsubscribe" in the Subject field.

To search the austechwriter archives, go to 
www.freelists.org/archives/austechwriter

To contact the list administrator, send a message to 
austechwriter-admins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
**************************************************

Other related posts: